The fuss started last week, when Buhl threatened to sue a lawyer who quoted a tweet of hers. After he sought advice online, constitutional lawyer Mark Randazza pointed out that you can't say something in public and subsequently claim that it's off the record.
![Screen Shot 2013-02-08 at 2.14.08 PM](http://boingboing.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Screen-Shot-2013-02-08-at-2.14.08-PM.png)
When this was pointed out at Techdirt, however, she ultimately threatened to sue the site's operators. When Jim Romenesko published her side of the story, verbatim, at her request, she threatened to sue him over his publication of her Twitter avatar.
The final, bizarre twist: Buhl herself faced the prospect of legal sanctions after a teenager's diary entries were published online without permission. Buhl was accused of publishing the personal journal of an ex-boyfriend's daughter online, then charged with second-degree harassment and other misdemeanors, according to the New Canaan Patch.
Techdirt's Tim Cushing has a question:
It's apparently OK to publicly post information from a minor's personal journal, but not OK to post a public Teri Buhl tweet anywhere else on the internet.And Gizmodo's Mario Aguilar sums up the whole sorry falseness of it all:
Teri Buhl (Teri-Buhl, get it?) needs a lesson on the law and common decency and the Internet.
No comments:
Post a Comment