
If
crucifixion as a means of capital punishment hadn't died out in the
ancient world, it would labeled cruel and unusual punishment, and would
never fly in the civilized world. The common wisdom is that the practice
ended with the reign of Constantine, the first christian emperor of
Rome (306 to 337 CE). However, some accounts of crucifixion appear after
he converted in 312.
Even if Constantine did, in
fact, end the practice of crucifixion, it’s not clear that he did so out
of respect for jesus’ alleged execution. Aurelius Victor, the earliest
historian to claim that Constantine banned crucifixion, explained that
the emperor was motivated by a sense of humanity rather than piety.
Crucifixion is a pretty gruesome way to go—significantly worse than the
New Testament makes it seem. Although jesus reportedly expired in a
matter of hours, many crucifixion victims clung to life for days. Even
in Roman times, it was considered an exceptionally cruel punishment,
reserved mainly for those who challenged state authority, such as
insurgents and enemy soldiers. (Joel Marcus of Duke described
crucifixion as “parodic exaltation,” because it gave rebels the fame
they sought, albeit in a grotesque form.) By some accounts, Constantine
replaced crucifixion with hanging, a less painful execution method.
Constantine’s supposed ban on crucifixion came as part of a package of
reforms, further suggesting that he was merely exercising human mercy.
Branding prisoners’ faces, for example, was also prohibited around the
same time—a reform that had nothing to do with jesus’ alleged execution.
Read more about the history of crucifixion at
Slate.
No comments:
Post a Comment