Parents
of teenagers know the agony of dealing with children who are
near-adults but not quite ready to be on their own. The natural
rebellion against parents and family can leave you pulling your hair
out. We hear about how adolescence didn’t exist in older times, and how
boys went to work and girls were married off at puberty. This was not
always true, as teenagers still needed guidance and job training. In
medieval times, there was a system in place for parents to deal harshly
with children going through that difficult period.
Around
the year 1500, an assistant to the Venetian ambassador to England was
struck by the strange attitude to parenting that he had encountered on
his travels.
He wrote to his masters in Venice that the English
kept their children at home "till the age of seven or nine at the
utmost" but then "put them out, both males and females, to hard service
in the houses of other people, binding them generally for another seven
or nine years". The unfortunate children were sent away regardless of
their class, "for everyone, however rich he may be, sends away his
children into the houses of others, whilst he, in return, receives those
of strangers into his own".
It was for the children's own good,
he was told - but he suspected the English preferred having other
people's children in the household because they could feed them less and
work them harder.
Besides that, a strange master and
a binding contract could often keep an adolescent on the straight and
narrow better than a parent who loved him unconditionally. It didn’t
always work out, especially for older teens who spent their master’s
money on "harlotes… dyce, cardes and other unthrifty games.” The BBC
News Magazine has more on
the medieval system of dealing with teenagers, and some specific stories of young people growing up in apprenticeships.
No comments:
Post a Comment