Welcome to ...

The place where the world comes together in honesty and mirth.
Windmills Tilted, Scared Cows Butchered, Lies Skewered on the Lance of Reality ... or something to that effect.


Thursday, May 26, 2011

Protect IP Act

Senate Panel OKs Controversial AntiPiracy Bill


As expected, the U.S. Senate's Judiciary Committee unanimously voted to approve a bill that targets Internet pirates based overseas.

The Protect IP Act looks to hand the U.S. Department of Justice the ability to seek a court order against allegedly infringing Web sites. The order could be served on search engines, certain Domain Name System providers, and Internet advertising firms--which would in turn be required to "expeditiously" make the target Web sites vanish from the Internet.

The bill was backed by leaders of both major political parties and is supported by a wide range of industries, including the film and music sectors. Backers of the legislation say that online piracy cuts deeply into their profits and kills jobs.

"The small businesses, artists, entrepreneurs, software designers, local journalists and every other segment of the creative community support the (Judiciary committee's decision) today," said Sandra Aistars, director of the Copyright Alliance, a group backed by varying copyright owners.

Critics, who include Google Chairman Eric Schmidt, have said the legislation threatens free speech by providing the government with a simple, effective way of silencing critics: brand them copyright pirates. Schmidt criticized the legislation in London last week and went as far as to suggest that Google could continue to fight it even it becomes law.

"If there is a law that requires DNS to do x," Schmidt told reporters, "and it's passed by both houses of Congress and signed by the president of the United States, and we disagree with it, then we would still fight it...If it's a request, the answer is we wouldn't do it."

Before the bill can be passed in the full Senate, it must overcome expected opposition from Sen. Ron Wyden (pictured- D-Ore.).

A spokesman from Wyden's office wasn't immediately available for comment. If Wyden opposes the bill, he can hold it up for an indefinite amount of time. Backers would likely try to reach some kind of compromise on the legislation with Wyden.

If a compromise can't be reached, the bill's supporters could try to put the bill up for a vote in the full Senate, where all the need is a majority. Meanwhile, a similar bill is expected to be introduced in the house and opposition there is said to be light.

No comments: