But funny, FAUX News never mentioned it
The repugican inquisition over the
Benghazi attacks has never really gone away, but it appears as though in the wake of the Boston Marathon bombing and
the House Oversight Committee’s Benghazi hearings this week there’s renewed
psycho-histrionics over Benghazi. Lindsey Graham and Faux News Channel in particular are
each crapping their cages over new allegations from an alleged whistleblower, while
they continue to deal in previously debunked falsehoods about the sequence of events
during and following the attacks. Faux News is predictably helming the biggest raft of hooey
on the situation — turning its attention to Hillary Clinton in an abundantly obvious early
move to stymie her presidential run before it even begins.So I thought I’d revisit some territory I covered back in October as a bit of a refresher — especially since it appears as if no one, including and especially the traditional press, intends to ask any of these obnoxious, opportunistic liars about why they’re so obsessed by this one attack yet they entirely ignored the dozen-plus consulate/embassy attacks that occurred when the shrub and Dick Cheney were allegedly “keeping us safe.”
The Benghazi attacks are absolutely not unprecedented even though they’re being treated that way by repugicans who are deliberately ignoring anything that happened prior to Obama.
No comments:
Post a Comment