Rep. Darrell Issa put out a seething statement that
reeked of a temper tantrum after Sec. of State John Kerry and the Obama
administration outsmarted him, and forced the repugican to back off of
having Kerry testify on Benghazi.
Here is Issa’s statement announcing that he has released Sec. Kerry from his obligation to testify at the June 12 Benghazi hearing:
“Seeing Secretary Kerry and others, who have
worked to obstruct critical oversight of Congress’ investigations into
Benghazi, attempt to use the upcoming June 12 hearing as a shield
against the Select Committee tells me it’s time to reassess. It’s been
disappointing to watch a long serving former Senator, like Secretary
Kerry, squirm his way to what I’m doing today – releasing him from the
upcoming hearing commitment he made only after we issued him a subpoena.
“No matter how long the investigation of a terrorist
attack that killed four Americans takes, getting the full truth is what
matters. The Select Committee is the House of Representatives’
commitment to getting this truth. It will conduct its investigation in
the face of an all-hands-on-deck effort by defenders of the principal
actors to further obscure the facts. While Speaker Boehner and I had
both originally concluded that Secretary Kerry needed to promptly
testify and explain why his Department had withheld subpoenaed
documents, neither of us immediately recognized how opponents of
congressional oversight would use this as an opportunity to distract
from the Select Committee’s effort.
“I am extremely proud that the Oversight
Committee’s investigation led to a bipartisan vote to establish the
Select Committee. Our work pierced the original false accounts
introduced by senior Administration officials in the immediate aftermath
of the attack, and gave the American people many essential facts about
events prior to, during and after that terrible night in Benghazi. As
much as we fought to learn what we could, bring critical witnesses
forward, and shame the Administration into disclosing more than it
originally intended, I expect the Select Committee’s unified
jurisdiction will afford it better access to the complete picture than
any of its investigative predecessors. In attempting to cover up
documents like the September 14 e-mail from Deputy National Security
Advisor Ben Rhodes, President Obama, Secretary Kerry, and other
officials have no one but themselves to blame for the increased scrutiny
they should soon expect.”
Issa’s statement reads like a bad movie villain who
is promising that he will have his revenge. I don’t know how scrutiny
could be increased any more than the six previous House repugican
Benghazi investigations already have. Issa comes off in this statement
like a spoiled child who has had his favorite toy taken away from him.
Rep. Issa threw quite a tantrum. He accused Sec. of State Kerry of
squirming and the administration of lying.
The California repugicans had been trying for weeks to sabotage the House Select Committee on Benghazi
after he was left off the panel. Sec. Kerry and the White House used
the dueling repugican committees to split the repugican cabal by declaring that
Kerry would only testify before one House committee, not both.
House Republican leaders were forced to make a
decision. Either they continue to let Issa run wild, or completely take
his prized Benghazi investigation away from him.
The truth is that the Obama administration outsmarted Darrell Issa
and the House repugicans. Issa can try to put a good face on this,
but the reality is that he has been demoted and the repugican Benghazi
circus has taken another turn towards revealing itself as a partisan
freak sideshow.
No comments:
Post a Comment