A general view of the exposed grave showing the body, bronzework
and remains of the iron frame
These excavations have revealed Bronze age boundary ditches and
occupation, a small hoard of four Middle Bronze Age bronze axes
(palstaves), an Iron Age roundhouse and a Roman building, set amongst
fields. But the chief interest lies in the finding of a rich, isolated
burial, which is not part of a larger cemetery and is not otherwise
distinguished from the rest of the site.
The deceased, a mature male more than 30 years old, was laid out in a grave and was accompanied by grave goods. These included three large, complete, pottery jars placed at the end of the grave, presumably containing offerings to the gods or food for the journey into the afterlife, an iron knife and several items made of bronze. One appears to be a cavalry helmet and the other a shield boss. Also present are two bronze latticework sheets highly decorated, perhaps used to cover the shield; they seem to big to be elaborate cheek-pieces for the helmet, but that is another possibility.
Close-up of the bronze shield boss and
latticework
The burial and its grave goods seem to have been placed in a large
coffin or casket bound by iron hoops with a further iron framed
structure placed on top. The bronze objects are not well preserved and
have been lifted in blocks of soil by a specialist for careful
excavation and conservation in the laboratory prior to their study in
detail. The provisional date of the burial from the associated pottery,
which seems to have been made specially for the funeral, and may have
its origins in Normandy, indicates that it took place at the very
beginning of what archaeologists term the Late Iron Age, perhaps around
50BC.
The burial does not appear to be so rich as some from the 1st century BC to 1st century AD in south-east England, but shares similarities with famous graves of Late Iron Age date from Welwyn and St Albans (Herts); Colchester (Essex); and Aylesford (Kent), and less close similarities with others from the continent. All of these are likely to have been graves of princes or chiefs (or, possibly, priests) but all are dated later than this site appears to be. It is also unclear if our warrior was himself from Gaul, or simply had acquired pottery from Normandy on his campaigns.
A general view of the grave early on in its excavation.
This photo
clearly shows
the iron framework and the three complete pots
The Iron Age people of this area were in essence pro-Roman, and the
Emperor Claudius, a century later, launched an invasion, initially, to
restore the local king Verica to his throne. Our deceased does not seem
rich enough to have been a king, but his weaponry, and likely date of
death, suggest he may have been one of the mercenaries Caesar claims
were accustomed to fight for the Gauls against him, which he used as one
of his pretexts for his abortive invasions of England. Cross-channel
links of this rather shadowy kind have long been known, but this grave
is one of the most exciting pieces of evidence yet found confirming the
personal nature of these connections.
The archaeological work is taking place as a requirement of the planning process on the advice of the archaeological officer of West Sussex County Council. ******************************************************************
No comments:
Post a Comment