Female Voting Power and The Looming Extinction of The repugican cabal
Democrats are wooing single women — a rising power of a voting bloc, while repugicans spit in their face.
While repugicans at Faux insult single women by calling them “Beyoncé voters” who depend on the government,
Democrats embrace them. Specifically all the single ladies out there — a
growing and powerful new voting bloc, who tend to vote for Democrats.
They’re even calling their new get out the vote push ROSIE, as in Rosie the Riveter, Re-engaging our Sisters in Elections. (Yes, Beyoncé has paid homage to Rosie.)
DCCC Executive Director Kelly Ward explained ROSIE
to NPR’s Mara Liasson in May, “We can identify a voter by their marital
status and then match that to a turnout model that helps us identify
those unmarried women who when they vote they will vote for Democrats,
but are not likely to vote this cycle. We want to go after those voters
and start a conversation with them about how this election has a stake
in their lives and why they should care about it.” And now, post Hobby
Lobby, Democrats have quite the calling card.
Jackie Calmes broke down the numbers in the New York Times Wednesday morning:
Half of all adult women over the age of 18 are unmarried — 56 million, up from 45 million in 2000 — and now account for one in four people of voting age. (Adult Hispanics eligible to vote, a group that gets more attention, number 25 million this year.) Single women have become Democrats’ most reliable supporters, behind African-Americans: In 2012, two-thirds of single women who voted supported President Obama. Among married women, a slim majority supported Mitt Romney.
She points out that the Democratic party isn’t asleep at the wheel. They’re wide awake and they’re wooing these voters:
Democrats and allied groups say they are wooing single women — young and old, highly educated and working class, never married and divorced or widowed — with unmatched ardor. They have seized on this week’s ruling by the Supreme Court’s conservative majority, five men, that family-owned corporations do not have to provide birth control in their insurance coverage, to add to their arguments that the Democrats, not the repugicans, represent the interests of women.
Democrats will be using the historical repugican assault on women’s rights (the legislation pushed by repugicans since the 2010 midterms is enough to make thinking people despair for their country) to motivate women to the polls.
This growing and powerful voting bloc is why we wrote that the Supreme Court (and the repugican cabal) would be sorry about Monday’s Hobby Lobby decision.
Just to seal the deal, the Court even took repugicans’ one talking
point away from them, by clarifying that they did indeed intend their
ruling to be taken broadly. That translates to all forms of birth
control that an employer can decide they don’t want to offer women in
their healthcare insurance, because they have feelings about women using
contraception. These feelings rarely seem to translate into any sense
at all, leaving these folks making an argument against all contraception
just so that they can get Obama. They call this position anti-abortion
(aka, in their inaccurate parlance, “anti-choice”), but of course it’s the
opposite, since contraception is the single best way to reduce
abortions.
As recent elections have shown, this bloc doesn’t
turn out for midterms but they make a difference in presidential
elections. However, they made a huge difference in Virginia after the repugican cabal turned off even repugican women by running what was
then seen as an extremist — but is now the norm — misogynistic,
woman-hater candidate who thinks he knows a lot more about a woman’s
body than he does.
But the Supreme Court just gave Democrats a way to
mobilize this voting bloc that doesn’t usually turn out in midterm
elections. The court handed it to Democrats on a silver platter. The wingnuts on the court might be agitators, but they aren’t the
brightest agitators going. Maybe they’re being instructed by Karl Rove,
and we all know thug is out.
Since single women are on the rise, repugicans have
gone out of their way to demonstrate their contempt for single women.
Instead of trying to woo single women, repugicans choose to try to
control them via shame, as if they have no idea what decade it is.
Women hold tremendous power in their hands; they can
force their needs and the needs of their children to be heard – but
first, they have to vote. In every election.
Five men who couldn’t find their way around a female
body or science or medicine to save themselves — obviously, or they
would know that contraception is often used for medical purposes — just
made a decision to spit in the face of all women who have ever used
contraception. They shouldn’t have the power to make decisions about
issues they clearly do not understand. A Democratic Congress could pass new legislation to protect women from the wingnut SCOTUS.
The repugicans have gone out of their way to shame
women for needing contraception; their newest talking point is that
birth control is only nine dollars, so get off your lazy slut butts and
pay for it yourselves. (repugican civility is at a low point, or what
one hopes is their low point.) It’s as if they want a teeny, tiny tent.
In the meantime, the Democratic Party is putting a ring on it.
No comments:
Post a Comment