“I have no family. I have no mother or father. My cats provide something that no family has ever given to me and that is emotional support.”
Coleman, who has lived at Mirabella since 2012, according to the
lawsuit, said he received a letter Aug. 1 of this year saying he needed
to get rid of the cats by Aug. 10.
A court petition filed on Monday says he pleaded with management to
exempt Rex and Milo from the new policy, to no avail. He said he got a
reminder letter on Aug. 7 and then a letter Aug. 11 saying his lease was
being terminated, and he needed to move out by Sept. 11.
Coleman is suing Mirabella, along with its director and parent company
Segora Corp., alleging that management violated the Texas Fair Housing
Act the Fort Worth City Code and the Texas Property code.
Refusal to make a “reasonable accommodation” for the animals constitutes
unlawful discrimination under the Housing Act and the City Code, the
lawsuit says. It says Mirabella “retaliated again him by terminating his
lease,” which violates the Texas Property Code.
Coleman also says the Mirabella is violating his lease, which he said
allows the cats.
Bryan McCaleb, president of Sagora Senior living in Fort Worth said that
management has “attempted to make contact with Coleman and his attorney
to resolve the situation:
“We have reviewed all of the files and documentation and we do not have
any documentation on the resident’s two cats being certified as therapy
animals. We have requested from the resident, their legal counsel and
Power of Attorney to provide us with the certified animal documentation
which has not been provided as of today [Aug. 20].”
Randy Turner, an attorney representing Coleman, said he provided information from Coleman’s psychologist documenting the need for the therapy cats and added that Rex and Milo don’t have to be certified as therapy animals. “Mirabella simply does not understand the Fair Housing Act or the law on assistance animals,” he said. “There is no such thing as a certified therapy animal and the law does not require that an animal be certified in any way before a landlord must provide accommodations.” Turner also said that under the Fair Housing Act a landlord must provide a “reasonable accommodation” in order to not discriminate against a disabled person who relies on an animal for emotional support. The law doesn’t address situations in which someone must share an apartment, he said. Although the cats would be permitted in a private apartment, Coleman can’t afford one, Turner said. He receives $644 a month in Supplemental Security Insurance payments, and pays $630 a month for rent and meals at Mirabella.
Randy Turner, an attorney representing Coleman, said he provided information from Coleman’s psychologist documenting the need for the therapy cats and added that Rex and Milo don’t have to be certified as therapy animals. “Mirabella simply does not understand the Fair Housing Act or the law on assistance animals,” he said. “There is no such thing as a certified therapy animal and the law does not require that an animal be certified in any way before a landlord must provide accommodations.” Turner also said that under the Fair Housing Act a landlord must provide a “reasonable accommodation” in order to not discriminate against a disabled person who relies on an animal for emotional support. The law doesn’t address situations in which someone must share an apartment, he said. Although the cats would be permitted in a private apartment, Coleman can’t afford one, Turner said. He receives $644 a month in Supplemental Security Insurance payments, and pays $630 a month for rent and meals at Mirabella.
No comments:
Post a Comment