An ancient, catastrophic flood or earthquake may explain how a bewildering rock formation in Colorado's Rocky Mountains formed, a new study finds.
For more than
120 years, geologists have wondered how giant chunks of Tava sandstone, a
sedimentary rock, had become inserted into a section of the igneous
rocks that shape the backbone of the Front Range, within the southern
Rockies. Scientists call formations where one rock is inserted into
another "intrusions."
The
rocks within the formation are "reversed from what we would ordinarily
expect," said the study's lead author, Christine Siddoway, a professor
of geology at Colorado College in Colorado Springs. Typically, it is
igneous rocks, such as granite, that intrude into sedimentary stone.
It's extremely unusual to find sandstone that has forced its way into
granite, making the Colorado formation a rare find, Siddoway said.
Intrusions of sedimentary rock into granite-type rock "speak of a
catastrophic event," she said, such as an earthquake or flood. An
earthquake can cause sediment to liquefy, as it did during the 6.0-magnitude earthquake
that hit Christchurch, New Zealand, in 2011. It could have been another
large earthquake that forced the sedimentary sandstone into the granite
in Colorado, she said.
Or, it could have been rapid-moving floodwaters that lodged the Tava sandstone sediment into a fracture in the granite, explaining the intrusion, Siddoway added.
Whether it was an earthquake or a flood that set the formation into
motion, the intrusion as we see it today can be explained by "natural
fracking," she said. The fracking that
we usually hear about is human fracking, in which machines are used to
pump water underground to create enormous pressure to crack open rocks
deep in the ground, so that fossil fuels can be extracted. But nature
can cause fracking too — rocks crack open underground and then particles
such as sand fill in the spaces.
"On a very grand scale, what allowed the Tava sandstone dikes to form
is analogous to what happens on a small scale by human-induced pressure
fracturing," Siddoway said.
The Tava sandstone, shown here, is likely between 680 million and 800 million years old
Rock of ages
The new study also hinted at how old the Tava sandstone may be, another riddle that has perplexed geologists.
The researchers analyzed samples from the sandstone that consisted
mostly of quartz, with pieces of feldspars, micas, magnetite and zircon, which is both a mineral and a semiprecious gem.
"[Zircon] is the workhorse for isotopic dating of rocks to find out
their age," Siddoway said. "The wonderful thing about zircon, that makes
it a good gemstone, is that it's very hard and difficult to cut. It
remains in the sedimentary record for a long time."
As soon as zircon forms, radioactive elements in its structure start to
decay at a known rate, allowing scientists to date it. In this study,
the geologists looked at tiny zircons in each sample, and then compared
them to zircons in other sedimentary rock samples of a known age,
Siddoway said.
The Tava
sandstone zircons, however, did not match those from 65 million years
ago or 500 million years ago, as other researchers had suggested.
"I was utterly shocked to find that," Siddoway said.
Instead, the zircons in the Tava sandstone matched those from rocks
from California's Death Valley and the Grand Canyon, the researchers
found.
By comparing the Tava
sandstone zircon to these other samples, the researchers determined its
age is between 680 million years old and 800 million years old. That
means that at the time the Tava formed, the continents were in a
supercontinent called Rodinia, which had nothing but single-celled microbes. Colorado may have been near or south of the equator.
"Earth would have looked like an unvegetated, rocky planet, like some of our neighbors in the solar system," Siddoway noted.
She plans to continue to study the sandstone. "And as work continues,
I'm very confident we'll be able to refine that to a more narrow range
of age," Siddoway said.
The study was published online Aug. 27 in the journal Lithosphere.
No comments:
Post a Comment