While the Labor Department's rule change was meant to protect
worker's rights, the Judge protected Home Care Associates, the
International Franchise Association, and the National Association for
Home…
The term wage slavery is a pejorative term used to
criticize economic exploitation and social stratification affecting
large groups of a workforce. Wage slavery is a result of unequal
bargaining power between labor and capital best represented by workers
slaving for long hours and poverty wages in sweatshops. The repugicans have
given every indication that between their opposition to raising the
minimum wage, and desire to abolishing it altogether, nothing would
please them or their Chamber of Commerce and corporate funders more than
a population earning slave wages.
It is likely that most big industries would love
nothing more than having repugicans pass legislation exempting them
from paying the minimum wage and, despite the nation’s labor laws, one
of the fastest growing, lowest paying industries in the nation succeeded
in not only winning an exemption from paying minimum wage, they were
exempted from overtime laws. One law, 1974’s Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA),
requires American employers to pay their domestic workers at least the
minimum wage as well as extra pay for overtime hours. Earlier in the
year, the Department of Labor expanded FLSA to cover home care providers
who were left out of minimum wage and overtime laws due to industry
leaders designating their work as nothing but providing “fellowship” for
elderly sick and disabled people.
The home care industry interpreted the exemption
broadly to deny basic labor rights from all their employees who provide
medical care, feed, clothe, and bathe Americans too sick to care for
themselves. In 2007, the wingnut Supreme Court ruled
that an employer forcing a woman to work extremely long hours was
within its right to refuse giving overtime pay because regardless the
extent of the care the woman provided, it was designated “fellowship and
protection.” The Department of Labor issued a new rule forbidding the
practice beginning January 1, 2015.
On Monday, just in time to stop implementation of
the Department of Labor’s rule change, a U.S. District Judge, Richard
Leon, bowed to industry pressure and struck down
the change that would finally give minimum wage and overtime pay
protections to home care workers. While the Labor Department’s rule
change was meant to protect worker’s rights, the Judge protected Home
Care Associates, the International Franchise Association, and the
National Association for Home Care & Hospice rights to make bigger
profits. The rapidly-growing industry’s leaders convinced the judge that
paying the minimum wage, and the outrageous idea of overtime pay, was
an abomination and would have a “destabilizing impact” on the nation’s fastest-growing industry.
According to the judge’s ruling, home care workers
who are employed by agencies and other third-party employers can legally
be denied the minimum wage and overtime pay if “agencies and
third-party employers” claim the workers provide “fellowship” rather
than more in-depth care. Workers employed by agencies can also be denied
overtime pay. The only thing the “agencies, third-party employers” and
judge did not decide, yet, is that home health care providers have to
work for free; but that is likely the next logical step in the very near
future to avoid the “destabilizing the impact” on the industry of
having to pay its employees at all.
Although home care workers make up one of the
fastest-growing industries in America with an aging population, they are
clearly one of the lowest paid. The workforce’s median wage is about
$20,000 a year, and it represents a 5% income decline since 2003 after
adjusting for inflation. Like an ever-growing number of American
workers, because they are prohibited from earning the federal minimum
wage, most workers live below the federal poverty line. In fact, about a
third of workers in New York City earn less than $15,000 annually, and clearly 40% of them are dependent on vanishing public benefits just to survive; it is the epitome of a slave wage workforce.
Even if the home care workforce could earn the
federal minimum of $7.25 hourly, they still could not support
themselves. Subsequently they have joined forces with the growing fast
food worker movement
protesting for a minimum raise increase of $15.00 per hour. The work
home care providers toil at can be long, grueling, and constant and not,
as the industry claims providing “fellowship and protect;” like a
babysitter. One home care provider who has worked for the same mentally
disabled client for ten years giving around-the-clock care for 199 hours every two weeks complained she has never had a penny of overtime pay. She said, “The work I do is not companionship or babysitting,”
but because the industry designates her as providing “fellowship” for
the she barely subsists in poverty, and she is not alone.
As the population ages, the number of home healthcare providers will grow by 70%
within the next five years. As of early 2014, there were 2.5 million
home care providers barely surviving due to working without minimum wage
or overtime pay which is why the Department of Labor made the rule
change. The real issue is that despite the explosion in available jobs,
the demand for home health care providers will far outpace
supply within the next decade and better wages and worker protections
would make the difficult jobs more appealing. However, like fast food
and large retail chains like Walmart and McDonald’s, the home healthcare
industry will never voluntarily raise wages.
President Obama has called for raising the minimum
wage to no avail, and in the recent midterm elections, voters in four
states overwhelmingly approved raising the minimum wage. But the same
voters also elected Republicans to Congress who have, ad nauseum,
stated they have no interest or intent on raising the minimum and a
growing number are in favor of abolishing the federal minimum. In fact,
last year House Republicans passed so-called “jobs legislation”
abolishing overtime pay, and several Republican states banned current
and future legislation raising the minimum wage, offering sick leave,
and sick pay.
Americans want higher wages for their increased, and
world-leading, productivity, but they will never get it as long as repugicans hold a majority in either house of Congress. Americans are
also aging and at the rate repugican governors and legislatures are
raiding pensions, lusting to slash Social Security, and keep home care
providers at poverty levels, many of those aging Americans are going to
be on their own because Republicans and the home care industry avidly
believe the path to prosperity is a population mired in wage slavery.
No comments:
Post a Comment