
A woman from Thetford, Vermont, erected a 60-foot by 24-foot barrier
obstructing her view of her neighbor's new home.
Ruth Dwyer has lived on her 200-plus acre farm in for more than 40
years.
For almost all of that time, Dwyer said she and her 150 animals had most
of the surrounding area to themselves.
That changed two years ago with the construction of a new home across
the street, overlooking her farm.
“Everything that goes on over there is taking place in a way that it
distracts the livestock because of the location of all the activity, and
it's very close. There never used to be any activity there. It's all
normal activity for a house. It's just not normal for my livestock,”
Dwyer said, adding she has no ill will towards her neighbors.
Dwyer recalled one instance when she was loading one of her horses onto a
van and it was spooked by a child who had come outside to play
basketball in her neighbor's driveway, which she said was clearly
visible from her barn.
“I knew it was going to be a problem,” Dwyer said.
So she planted cedar trees on her property line, but said they’ll take
years to grow tall enough to block the view of her neighbors’ activity.
In November, she built what she described as a ‘temporary screen’ to
shield her view.
“I had a friend who's a contractor and he said, ‘You know, I could put
up a piece of fabric between some telephone poles and we'll brace it and
that's it,’” Dwyer said.
Once the structure was up, town officials took notice.
Thetford zoning director Mary Ellen Parkman said she notified Dwyer in November that she needed to apply for a building permit for the structure. Under Thetford zoning laws, any wall or fence more than 10 feet tall requires a building permit. Dwyer said her structure doesn’t fall into those categories, therefore it does not violate any rules. “It’s not a wall, it’s not a fence, it’s a screen for livestock control,” Dwyer said. Parkman said Dwyer applied for a building permit in December, which was denied in February because “it did not fit the character of the neighborhood.” Parkman said at that point, the ‘screen’ became an ‘illegal structure.’ Dwyer said she considered other options, like installing a solar array or building a more permanent fixture, like a barn. However, she said those options aren’t economically feasible for her, and she didn’t want something to stay there long-term.
No comments:
Post a Comment