The tea party’s Inspiration: King George III.
The
repugicans are wedded to their theories of government (aka
liberal) tyranny but all the evidence, and I do mean the entirety of the
available evidence, demonstrates that tyranny is imposed not by the
political left but by the political right.
We have actual and ongoing examples in both Wisconsin and Michigan of
what repugican governance looks like, and it’s not pretty. It is the
suppression of the will of the people, in complete violation of
everything the United States stands for: that political power derives
from the will of the people.
According to tea party political philosophy, political power derives
from corporations, plutocrats, and religious fanatics. These oligarchs
have a message for you: “Fuck you.” And ironically, given Tea Party
pretensions, that is precisely the attitude of King George III in 1774.
In fact, despite all the talk about Obama acting like George III, it
is the tea party that has embraced the imperial British heritage. The
Colonists in the days, weeks, and months leading up to the Revolution
were literally up in arms over the
Massachusetts Government Act of May 20, 1774.
Kevin Philips in his
1775: A Good Year for Revolution (2012) describes the effect of this measure:
The Massachusetts Charter of 1691 was eviscerated. Key
provisions of the new statute all but eliminated town meetings, ended
locally chosen juries, gave the governor sole power to appoint and
remove judges, and transferred the selection of the Governor’s Council,
the upper legislative house, from elected representatives to Crown
appointees.
Is the first thing that comes to your mind the tea party rape of Michigan democracy? PoliticusUSA
has extensively covered the imposition of tea party tyranny in Michigan, which just as did the Massachusetts Government Act,
ignore the will of the people.
Even when the outrageous use of “emergency managers,” analogous to
the Crown’s appointment of judges and legislators, were overwhelmingly
revoked by the people, the governor ignored the vote – simply pretended
it hadn’t happened. Governor Rick Snyder and the tea party have no more
interest in what the people want than did George III and his ministers.
The colonists, for reasons you can readily understand, called this act and others like it the
Intolerable Acts.
And they were intolerable. The suspension of local democracy is a
serious matter because Democracy is not imposed from the top down but
created from the bottom up. The repugicans know this, which is why they
are so intent on destroying it at the local level through imposition of
the very [heavy-handed] government they claim to hate.
These acts are just as intolerable today. And they are no more an
expression of the popular will in 2012 than they were in 1774, but
rather the act of a tyrannical and authoritarian mindset intent on
imposing the will of a powerful minority on the majority.
For the British, the Intolerable Acts were the Coercive Acts, a no
more inspiring if somewhat more precise name for the legislation. The
Coercive Acts (the others were the Quartering Act, the Boston Port Bill,
the Administration of Justice Act, and the Quebec Act) were meant to do
just that: coerce the colonists into obedience.
The tea party laws in Wisconsin and Michigan (and elsewhere; these two
states are merely the most complete examples) trace their lineage
directly back to the Prime Minister, Lord North, who said that the
Massachusetts Government Act
was intended “to take the executive power from the hands of the
democratic part of government.” In other words, as Black Liberal Boomer
put it, “Strangle Blue States [or colonies] in the Crib.”
As a result, the Tea Party adoption of patriot flags and garb is not
only hypocritical; it is nothing short of obscene. Christopher Gladsen
could never have imagined his “Don’t Tread on Me” flag would be used not
as an expression of liberty, but of tyranny.
Yet again and again repugicans like
Rand Paul,
insist that it is the Democrats who are behaving in a tyrannical
fashion. It does not matter that most of what they say is composed of
lies, often old lies that have been retold countless times and proven
false on each and every occasion. And they
have proven that, if thwarted, there is no limit to what they will stoop to in revenge.
World Net Daily is, no surprise, a hotbed of such stupidity. But they
are hardly alone. Faux News reaches a far wider market and is only a
little less absurdist in its claims, and there is also Breitbart.com
and The Blaze, Drudge Report, and others. All of them would have you
believe that conservatives champion liberty while liberals want to
impose tyranny.
The fact is that conservatism is not about liberty, but about
maintenance of the status quo, which is often diametrically opposed to
the concept of liberty (the continuation of slavery and the
disenfranchisement of women being two notable examples). Liberalism, on
the other hand, is about liberty, about the granting, not the
suppression of rights. Liberty demands that people of all ethnic and
religious backgrounds and economic statuses have the same rights, which
is, after all, what the Constitution grants them.
Every law restricting this right to equality comes from the repugican cabal, whether it is limiting your right to employment, equal
pay, free exercise of speech or religion, or even voting.
That is when the repugicans have charge of any government local,
state, or Federal. Where they lack complete authority, as in the
President and Senate, they foment rebellion, and quite openly. Just as
the colonies were in revolt well before the Declaration of Independence
in 1776 (as King George III recognized in October, 1774 when he forbade
the export of war supplies to the Colonies), the repugican cabal is
already in revolt against the parts of the Federal government it does
not control. The current scramble to obtain firearms can be likened to
the colonist’s mad scramble to obtain both firearms and powder in 1774
and 1775. Americans waiting for the ball to drop do not realize that it
has already fallen.
“These are the times that try men’s souls,” wrote Thomas Paine in The
American Crisis during the winter of 1776. If the American Revolution,
as opposed to the American War for Independence has never ended, as some
have argued, those words are doubly applicable today, as we face the
long-awaiting counter-revolution of conservatism.