After a two-week civil trial a U.S. District Chief Judge,
Marcia Krieger, ruled the lawsuit lacked standing and dismissed it, and
said the plaintiffs presented absolutely no evidence…
Sanity refers to a human mind that is sound,
rational, and healthy, and the condition is woefully lacking in great
numbers of Americans on a number of issues. One could not possibly
expect any sane human being to actively support policies that give
people the tools to cause mass destruction of human lives, and it is
precisely why gun nuts agitating for more guns in the hands of more
people are considered at least irrational and likely insane. On
Thursday, a federal judge issued a
ruling that
probably drove irrational gun fanatics crazy because she upheld what
any rational human being would consider sane gun safety laws.
Since suffering two very high-profile and deadly
mass shootings in their state, and witnessing, with the entire nation,
the mass execution of twenty innocent school children and six adults,
Colorado Democrats had seen enough and passed two gun safety laws. The
laws, one requiring background checks for all private gun sales and
transfers, and one banning ammunition magazines holding more than 15
rounds were the subject of a lawsuit filed by gun nuts and Colorado
County Sheriffs whose job is, among other things, protecting the public
from gun violence.
After a two-week civil trial a U.S. District Chief Judge, Marcia Krieger, ruled the lawsuit lacked standing and
dismissed
it, and said the plaintiffs presented absolutely no evidence that
limiting gun magazines to 15 rounds seriously diminished anyone’s
ability to defend themselves.
She said, “
Of the many law enforcement officials
called to testify, none were able to identify a single instance in
which they were involved where a single civilian fired more than 15
shots in self defense.” Addressing the county sheriffs complaint
that expanded background checks were abusive and a violation of Colorado
gun nuts 2nd Amendment rights, Krieger said there were over 600
firearm dealers in the state actively performing private background
checks and that it took less than 15 minutes for the Colorado Bureau of
Investigation to run a simple background check. However, the county
sheriffs did not file suit over the time it took to run a background
check, they sued to strike down the law and allow any lunatic, or
criminal, to easily acquire a firearm; especially one with a
high-capacity magazine.
Joining the Colorado County Sheriffs in the lawsuit
was the Rocky Mountain Gun Owners Association (RMGOA) represented by
Dudley W. Brown who was recently elevated to lead the National
Association for Gun Rights (NAGR). The county sheriffs could not bring
the lawsuit of their own accord, but they could join the other
gun-nutts and give credence to the gun nuts’ claims that
background checks and 15-round magazines were an atrocity. Dudley W.
Brown spoke for the gun zealots as a chief lobbyist for the gun owners’
groups.
Oddly, Brown claimed his group was responsible for
House Majority Leader Eric Cantor’s primary defeat. Brown claims NAGR
attacked Cantor for “giving lip service” to a proposed Virginia
gun sales check after the Virginia Tech mass shooting in 2007 despite
Cantor’s “A” legislative rating from the National Rifle Association. It
gives new meaning to lunacy when a staunch supporter of 2nd Amendment
rights faced attack ads for a passing remark in the wake of a mass
shooting seven years ago. However, groups like RMGOA and NAGR are going
to oppose any sane gun safety laws, but the Colorado County Sheriffs
should welcome the idea of fewer guns in the hands of lunatics.
Unfortunately, it is groups like the county sheriffs and other law
enforcement officials who are most likely to champion more guns in the
hands of more lunatics and openly refuse to enforce existing gun laws.
Last Monday, an official with New York Oath Keepers
called on all law enforcement officers to disobey orders to enforce
constitutional laws they deemed unconstitutional and then denied his
group held “wingnut, anti-government views.” The Oath Keeper, John Wallace, was incensed over an “alleged”
New York State Intelligence Center counter-terrorism bulletin that
linked the Oath Keeper’s organization and similar groups to the recent
shootings of law enforcement officers by extremists. Likely, the
bulletin referred to the Oath Keepers joining the Cliven Bundy armed
standoff with federal agents and the murder of two Las Vegas police
officers and a “good guy with a gun” at the hands of two lunatics who joined the Bundy standoff. Wallace bemoaned the bulletin was the product of “left wing” and “communist” organizations such as the New York Times, CNN, and Huffington Post.
Wallace’s call for law enforcement to disobey laws
they deem unconstitutional mirrors other Oath Keepers, former sheriff
Richard Mack, and assorted lunatics gathered at the Bundy standoff as an
integral part of the “
fight against socialist tyranny.”
Wallace’s main complaint though, like the Colorado County Sheriff’s
suing the state, is that New York’s Safe Act, which stiffens gun laws,
was another unconstitutional law police should not enforce even though a
state Supreme Court judge
dismissed a challenge to the law in April. According to Wallace, “
honorable
men and women simply will not submit to a tyrannical lust for power by
the political incompetence of the governor and the president,” and said law enforcement officers would interpret laws on their own to determine whether they were constitutional.
Even if one sets aside the asinine idea that law
enforcement refuses to enforce legally passed laws due to their absurd
contention they have authority to determine the constitutionality of a
law, it is sheer lunacy to oppose gun restrictions meant to protect the
lives of innocent civilians. What most Americans will take away from the
federal judge dismissing Colorado sheriff’s lawsuit against sane gun
laws is that there is no reasoning with gun nuts and gun safety laws
are reasonable. One may have thought the brutal murder of two Las Vegas
police officers by gun nuts standing with seditionists Cliven Bundy,
Oath Keepers, former sheriff Richard Mack, and armed militias would
stun some sense into gun-crazed law enforcement officers, but obviously
that is not, and will never be, the case.
At least, and this is important, a federal judge
recognized that Colorado’s two basic gun safety laws do not abridge any
2nd Amendment agitators’ rights, and it should embolden other sane state
legislatures to follow Colorado’s lead and protect their citizens’
lives. Because one thing is certain, many county sheriffs and other law
enforcement officials have no interest in, and no intention to, protect
the public from more mass shootings; even when police officers are
gunned down. The real tragedy is that despite overwhelming public
support for sane gun safety laws, there are just enough 2nd Amendment
lunatics who support county sheriffs, the NRA, Oath Keepers, open-carry
bullies, and repugicans who love the idea of well-armed citizens with “wingnut, anti-government views” armed and ready to “fight against socialist tyranny” and destroy any semblance of sanity in America.