The repugican
attempts to nullify federal laws in Missouri are on hold after attempts
to override Gov. Nixon's veto failed in the senate…
Missouri repugicans appear to have failed for now in their attempt to secede from the Union. We wrote yesterday about HB 436, the
Second Amendment Preservation Act, Democratic Governor Jay Nixon’s veto of that bill, and the coming vote to overturn that veto.
That
vote for the blatantly unconstitutional bill, despite support shown by a
couple of hundred die-hard gun owners gathered on the Capitol lawn,
failed.
Yes,
House repugicans barely managed to get HB 436 past Nixon’s veto, by a
vote of 109 to 49 (with three abstentions) but in the Senate, the vote,
following an hour-long debate, was 22 to 12, with two repugicans voting
against overriding the veto. There are 24 repugicans in the Senate and
a two-thirds majority was needed. They failed by just one vote.
Senate
President Pro Tem Tom Dempsey (r-St. Charles) and Floor Leader Ron
Richard (r-Joplin) were the two repugicans who voted against. Dempsey
said something very unusual for a modern-day repugican: “My love of the
Second Amendment doesn’t trump my love of the First Amendment.” That is
not to say he won’t support another such bill that addresses his
concerns. He added that, “We need to work harder on crafting the
legislation.”
Gov. Nixon said at a press conference after the
vote, “It’s a defining moment. Today was about protecting our economy,
our communities and, especially, our schools from this costly and
misguided bill.”
Yesterday brought an end – for now – to a
contentious battle. The repugicans positioned themselves as defenders of
the Second Amendment while seeming to place more trust in the Tenth,
while Democrats pointed to the Supremacy Clause, which puts federal laws
above state laws.
There were other issues too, and not so minor. As Rep. Jill Schlupp (D-Creve Coeur)
pointed out yesterday
before the House vote, “A pedophile with a gun will be protected from
having his name published” and “A drug dealer will be invisible from the
public, if he owns a gun.
The repugicans never seem to think about
the consequences of their actions. Newspapers would not even have been
able to publish photos of heroic hunters with their trophies without
violating the law.
Governor Nixon and Attorney General Chris,
Koster (a former repugican) had both spoken out strongly against HB
436, as had the Missouri Sheriff’s Association. And Nixon, up until this
point, had been very pro-gun lobby. But the gun lobby isn’t interesting
in being pro-Constitution and Nixon apparently recognized this, as the
Constitution consists of more than just the Second and Tenth Amendments.
And
then there is the little issue of a war we fought from 1861 to 1865
that settled the issue of where supremacy lies. Democrats, at least,
remember who won that war.
Jefferson City’s News Tribune
reported that
Koster had sent a letter to lawmakers on September 3, pointing out that
HB 436 would render cooperation between Missouri law enforcement and
federal officials impossible, and Brian Nieves (r-Washington), like most repugicans when faced with uncongenial facts, responded with an
ad-hominem attack, calling Koster’s letter a “smear campaign,” “a joke”
and “a bunch of baloney,” and saying Koster “has lied and lied and
lied.”
With reasoned counter-arguments like that at their disposal, it is difficult to see how repugicans lost the debate.
In any event, had the measure passed, the
The Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence said yesterday that it was prepared to file suit in federal court to stop the law from taking effect.
From the Brady Center’s press release:
“In
its rush to make a political statement, the Missouri legislature has
trampled on the U.S. Constitution, as well as the Missouri
Constitution,” said Stuart Plunkett of Morrison & Foerster LLP,
co-counsel for the Brady Center.
“The Missouri law ignores the
Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution, and violates
fundamental rights to due process and free speech. It is clearly
unconstitutional.”
The petulant Nieves, a big fan of
repetition, promised, “The fight ain’t over. We’ll be back to visit it
again and again.” He also promised revenge against Koster, who is
expected to run for governor in 2016: “The people of Missouri will
remember what you did when you ask them to be their next governor.”
The
people, I suspect, will also remember who not only threatened to expose
them to the ravages of machine gun-toting criminals, but who tried to
secede from the Union.
Eventually perhaps, and it seems to be a
hard, slow, painful process, sometimes consisting of repeated sharp
blows to the head, Americans will discover who truly represents their
interests, and it isn’t the repugican cabal.