Study shows humble CEOs are good for business
Forget the stereotypes of arrogant, macho leaders who don’t care […]
Welcome to ...
The place where the world comes together in honesty and mirth.
Windmills Tilted, Scared Cows Butchered, Lies Skewered on the Lance of Reality ... or something to that effect.
Windmills Tilted, Scared Cows Butchered, Lies Skewered on the Lance of Reality ... or something to that effect.
Tuesday, August 5, 2014
The Daily Drift
Carolina Naturally is read in 200 countries around the world daily.
Today is - National Night Out
Don't forget to visit our sister blog: It Is What It Is
Some of our reader today have been in:
The Americas
United
States - Martinique - Argentina - Puerto Rico - Brazil - Mexico -
Canada - Colombia - Chile Dominican Republic - Ecuador - Sint Eustatius
and Saba
Europe
England - Ukraine - Czech Republic - Spain - France - Portugal - Italy - Ireland - Iceland - Russia
Slovenia - Denmark - Romania - Netherlands - Norway - Latvia - Sweden - Bosnia-Herzegovina
Germany
Asia
Cambodia - Pakistan - Kuwait - India - Iran - Thailand - Sri Lanka - Mauritius - Malaysia - Indonesia China - Vietnam - Macau
Africa
Tunisia
The Pacific
Australia - Philippines
Today in History
1391 | Castilian sailors in Barcelona, Spain set fire to a Jewish ghetto, killing 100 people and setting off four days of violence against Jews. | |
1763 | Colonel Henry Bouquet decisively defeats the Indians at the Battle of Bushy Run in Pennsylvania during Pontiac's rebellion. | |
1762 | Russia, Prussia and Austria sign a treaty agreeing on the partition of Poland. | |
1815 | A peace treaty with Tripoli–which follows treaties with Algeria and Tunis–brings an end to the Barbary Wars. | |
1858 | The first transatlantic cable is completed. | |
1861 | Congress adopts the nation's first income tax to finance the Civil War. | |
1864 | The Union Navy captures Mobile Bay in Alabama. | |
1892 | Harriet Tubman receives a pension from Congress for her work as a nurse, spy and scout during the Civil War. | |
1914 | The British Expeditionary Force mobilizes for World War I. | |
1914 | The first electric traffic signal lights are installed in Cleveland, Ohio. | |
1915 | The Austro-German Army takes Warsaw, in present-day Poland, on the Eastern Front. | |
1916 | The British navy defeats the Ottomans at the naval battle off Port Said, Egypt. | |
1921 | Mustapha Kemal is appointed virtual ruler of the Ottoman Empire. | |
1941 | The German army completes taking 410,000 Russian prisoners in Uman and Smolensk pockets in the Soviet Union. | |
1951 | The United Nations Command suspends armistice talks with the North Koreans when armed troops are spotted in neutral areas. | |
1962 | Actress Marilyn Monroe dies under mysterious circumstances. | |
1964 | President Lyndon Johnson begins bombing North Vietnam in retaliation for Gulf of Tonkin incident and asks Congress to go to war against North Vietnam. | |
1974 | President Richard Nixon admits he ordered a cover-up for political as well as national security reasons. | |
1981 | President Ronald Reagan fires 11,500 striking air traffic controllers. | |
1992 | Four police officers indicted on civil rights charges in the beating of Rodney King. | |
1995 | Croatian forces capture the city of Knin, a Serb stronghold, during Operation Storm. | |
1997 | Mastermind of the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, Ramzi Yousef, goes on trial. | |
2012 | A gunman in Oak Creek, Wisconsin, opens fire in a Sikh temple, killing six before committing suicide. |
Greatest Terrorism Threat In America Not Al Qaeda, It’s Wingnut Sovereign Citizens
Radical wingnut groups who refuse to recognize the authority of the federal government, like those who flocked to Bundy Ranch and now parade around the U.S.-Mexico border, represent the clearest threat to their communities, even more so than Islamic terrorists or white supremacist groups.
That’s the takeaway from a new landmark study by the National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Response to Terrorism (START). The group surveyed hundreds of law enforcement officials and over 170 agencies across the United States in an effort to understand how the people tasked with stopping terrorism view the threats on the ground.
What the team discovered was that the notion of Islamic extremists plotting to blow buildings was far less likely than homegrown so-called “Sovereign Citizens” who stockpile weapons and hold a seething resentment towards the federal government. Consequently, 86 percent of those interviewed agreed that this movement posed a “serious terrorist threat,” the highest of any group inquired about.
Compare that to just 8 years earlier in a similar questionnaire found that nearly every agency was still thinking about Islamic extremism.
What’s changed in the time between 2007 and now? The most obvious thing is the nation got its first African American president with the election of Barack Obama. Fueled by racism, wingnut fear mongering and the threats of “socialism,” the sovereign citizen movement has seen its membership explode in the last few years. It’s no coincident that two of the biggest sovereign citizen groups The Three Percenters and The Oath keepers were both founded around the time Obama was first elected.
This isn’t just an intellectual exercise, either. In June, a husband and wife killed three people in a shooting rampage based in part around the idea that they were kicking off an anti-government “revolution.”
Forbes gives a chilling account of their final moments:
It’s examples like that which may explain why sovereign citizens are one of the few potential terror groups that didn’t see a decline in their perceived threat. As their numbers swell and their anger rises, the odds of a major act of terror occurring would seem to rise.
That’s the takeaway from a new landmark study by the National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Response to Terrorism (START). The group surveyed hundreds of law enforcement officials and over 170 agencies across the United States in an effort to understand how the people tasked with stopping terrorism view the threats on the ground.
What the team discovered was that the notion of Islamic extremists plotting to blow buildings was far less likely than homegrown so-called “Sovereign Citizens” who stockpile weapons and hold a seething resentment towards the federal government. Consequently, 86 percent of those interviewed agreed that this movement posed a “serious terrorist threat,” the highest of any group inquired about.
Compare that to just 8 years earlier in a similar questionnaire found that nearly every agency was still thinking about Islamic extremism.
What’s changed in the time between 2007 and now? The most obvious thing is the nation got its first African American president with the election of Barack Obama. Fueled by racism, wingnut fear mongering and the threats of “socialism,” the sovereign citizen movement has seen its membership explode in the last few years. It’s no coincident that two of the biggest sovereign citizen groups The Three Percenters and The Oath keepers were both founded around the time Obama was first elected.
As the Anti-Defamation League explains:
Formed in March 2009 and led by Stewart Rhodes, a Nevada lawyer, the Oath Keepers encourage members of the military and law enforcement to pledge not to follow certain hypothetical “orders” from the federal government. These “orders,” including one “to put American citizens in detention camps,” and another “to disarm the American people,” echo longstanding conspiracy theories embraced by anti-government extremists, who claim that the U.S. government is creating a police state. The Oath Keepers try to appeal to military and law enforcement personnel by reminding them that they swore an oath to defend the Constitution “from all enemies, foreign and domestic,” and suggesting that now is the time to live up to that oath by resisting an allegedly tyrannical government.The idea that Obama (who many view as a black, islamic foreigner) is coming to take their guns and their rights resonates with a certain type of paranoid person. Situations like Cliven Bundy’s cattle ranch standoff only reinforce their sense that it’s them against the government. It’s no surprise then that law enforcement officers are extremely worried about what kind of violent, drastic plans these people are cooking up to fight their perceived oppression.
The Three Percenters, formed in late 2008, are a loosely organized movement centered around an obscure, and not particularly accurate, Revolutionary War “statistic” that claimed that only 3% of the American population during the Revolutionary War participated as combatants in the war. The group asserts that they are a modern counterpart to that mythical 3% of American Revolutionary-era patriots and also represent the three percent of the population of American gun owners “who will not disarm.”
This isn’t just an intellectual exercise, either. In June, a husband and wife killed three people in a shooting rampage based in part around the idea that they were kicking off an anti-government “revolution.”
Forbes gives a chilling account of their final moments:
On June 8, 2014, Jerad Dwain Miller, 31, and his wife Amanda Woodruff Miller, 22, entered a Las Vegas pizzeria and without any provocation or warning, shot and killed two police officers sitting in a booth eating lunch. The pair dragged the officers to the floor, took their weapons and ammunition, and draped a yellow flag over one of the bodies. They placed a swastika-stamped manifesto on top of the flag, and pinned a note on the other officer’s body that read, “This is the start of the revolution.”Just weeks before, the two had been seen at Bundy’s ranch parading around the premises with weapons daring police officers to try to take them.
The couple continued their spree in a nearby Wal-Mart. Jerad wore military-style clothing and body armor and he yelled to the Wal-Mart shoppers, “Tell the police the revolution has begun.” To emphasize his announcement, he fired a round into the ceiling, while Amanda shot and killed a brave bystander who tried to stop them. They engaged the police in a shootout for roughly fifteen minutes while hiding in a shopping aisle in the back of the store. Amanda aimed her weapon at her husband, but he had already been hit by a bullet from a police rifle, so she turned the gun on herself and pulled the trigger while the police watched the couple through a security camera.
It’s examples like that which may explain why sovereign citizens are one of the few potential terror groups that didn’t see a decline in their perceived threat. As their numbers swell and their anger rises, the odds of a major act of terror occurring would seem to rise.
Human Rights Watch/ACLU: U.S. surveillance harming journalism, law, democracy
The
practice of journalism and of law in the United States is being
dramatically, negatively harmed by large-scale surveillance by the NSA
and other intelligence agencies. That's the finding of a new report from
Human Rights Watch and the ACLU, who conclude "[s]urveillance is
undermining media freedom and the right to counsel, and ultimately
obstructing the American people's ability to hold their government to
account."Researchers conducted exhaustive interviews with
senior government officials, attorneys, and journalists to complete the
102-page report, "With Liberty to Monitor All: How Large-Scale US
Surveillance is Harming Journalism, Law, and American Democracy."
"People are increasingly scared to talk about anything," observed one Pulitzer Prize winner, including unclassified matters that are of legitimate public concern. […]
This situation has a direct effect on the public's ability to obtain important information about government activities, and on the ability of the media to serve as a check on government, Human Rights Watch and the ACLU found.
Journalists expressed concern that, rather than being treated as essential checks on government and partners in ensuring a healthy democratic debate, they may be viewed as suspect for doing their jobs. One prominent journalist summed up what many seemed to be feeling: "I don't want the government to force me to act like a spy. I'm not a spy; I'm a journalist." […]
"People are increasingly scared to talk about anything," observed one Pulitzer Prize winner, including unclassified matters that are of legitimate public concern. […]
This situation has a direct effect on the public's ability to obtain important information about government activities, and on the ability of the media to serve as a check on government, Human Rights Watch and the ACLU found.
Journalists expressed concern that, rather than being treated as essential checks on government and partners in ensuring a healthy democratic debate, they may be viewed as suspect for doing their jobs. One prominent journalist summed up what many seemed to be feeling: "I don't want the government to force me to act like a spy. I'm not a spy; I'm a journalist." […]
9 secrets your debt collector doesn’t want you to know
by Allison Martin
Unfortunately, many take unfair and illegal advantage of debtors because many debtors lack basic knowledge about their rights. To avoid falling for collectors’ traps, you must understand the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. The Federal Trade Commission explains some of your rights here.
Here are nine little-understood facts your debt collector doesn’t want you to know:
1. You are not obligated to communicate with collection agencies
Tired
of receiving the phone calls and letters from pushy collection
representatives urging you to pay or else? You can stop those companies
dead in their tracks with a cease-and-desist letter.
But
understand that they may pursue legal action if you do so. And the
agency has the right to notify you via mail of the termination of
collection efforts or their intention to turn to the court system for assistance, if applicable.
When
a debt collector initially calls, don’t ignore it, and don’t ignore any
summons to appear in court about the debt. In that first call or in a
follow-up letter, the collector must provide details about the money you
supposedly owe.After that, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau says:
If you dispute a debt (or part of a debt) in writing within 30 days of when you receive the required information from the debt collector, the debt collector cannot call or contact you until after your dispute has been investigated and the debt collector has provided the verification of the debt in writing to you.
You can also request that the creditor give you the name and address of the original creditor. If you make that request in writing within 30 days, the debt collector has to stop all debt collection activities until the debt collector provides you that information.
If
the debt collector reaches out to you before the investigation is
complete or starts to harass you about the outstanding balance, they may
be in violation of the FDCPA. You can file a complaint with the attorney general’s office in your state, the Federal Trade Commission or the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Or you may be able to get free legal help.
2. You don’t have to disclose personal information
There
is no law mandating the disclosure of identifying information, such as
your Social Security number and your date of birth, to debt collectors.
They may insist that it’s required to verify the debt, but it’s not.
3. Paying off an account in collections won’t wipe it from your credit reports
That account in collections will remain on your credit reports for seven years, FICO says, even if you pay it in full.
However, when you
negotiate with the collections agency to settle the debt, either by full
or partial payment, you can ask that they have the debt removed from
your credit reports. If they agree, make sure you have that in writing
from them before you pay it off. (See: “Ask Stacy: Can You Help Me Clean Up my Credit History?“)
4. Your assets are not at risk, yet
During
the collection process, the representatives are allowed to bug you,
with limits, in an effort to collect on the delinquent account. But they
cannot garnish your wages unless a judgment is issued in court.That doesn’t apply to all debt. For instance, the federal government does not need a court order to garnish your wages for student loan debt.
The rule doesn’t apply when you fall behind on your mortgage or car loan. In some states, no court action is required to foreclose on a house. And the repo man doesn’t need a court order to take your car.
Take a look at Nolo’s article to get an idea of which of your assets may be at risk.
5. You may not have to fork over a big chunk of cash immediately
The
debt collector wants the largest possible amount it can get from you to
beef up its earnings. But you may be able to set up a payment plan that
fits within your budget.Just remember that the collector is not legally required to agree to a payment plan. But you can ask.
6. You may be able to negotiate the best deal at the end of the month
It
turns out, you may be able to score the best deal with debt collectors
toward the end of the month. Fred Williams, a former collection agent
and author of “Fight Back Against Unfair Debt Collection Practices,” told Daily Finance:
I think most agencies go on a calendar month schedule. The end of the month is when collectors’ bonuses are determined. In addition to the increased threats made because they were under pressure to make their quotas, that’s also the time to get a deal because they’re under pressure to bring in the money quickly. They want a settlement, cash in short order. The end of the month is a time to close the deal.
7. You may be able to work with the original creditor
In
some instances, the original creditor will be willing to work with you
to collect the amount owed. However, if it has already sold the account
to a third-party debt collector and charged it off in the books, you’re
left with only one option. And that’s working with the debt collectors.
8. Your delinquent debts are nobody’s business
Unless
you have spouse or co-signer, or an attorney working on your behalf,
debt collectors must keep their lips sealed about your outstanding
balances. And if they reach out to others in an effort to locate you,
all contact with those people must cease once you are located.
Consumer lawyer Sukhman Dhami told Credit.com:We call these “third-party disclosures,” a violation of Section 1692c(b) of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, and they are exceptionally common, particularly when the debt collector leaves a message on a public answering machine. These public answering machine violations are called “Foti” violations after the landmark case Foti v. NCO Financial Systems.
9. You may be off the hook
Debt
collectors probably won’t tell you this, but once the statute of
limitations on debt in your state has lapsed, you’re off the hook,
although that likely won’t stop them from trying to collect the money.
Atlanta bankruptcy lawyer Jonathan Ginsburg told Credit.com:
“In most states, the statute of limitations runs four to six years from the date you last made a payment. And that’s the catch. In some states, a voluntary payment on a stale debt can revive the debt and make it legally collectible. Stale (or zombie) debt is big business,” he adds.
Money Talks News finance expert Stacy Johnson added this advice:
Keep in mind that after the statute of limitations expires, unless the debt has been charged off or discharged in bankruptcy, you still owe the money. In other words, the statute of limitations doesn’t wipe out the debt, it just reduces the legal remedies available to collect it.
So if you find yourself in this situation, the smart move is to call a consumer lawyer (you can find one at the National Association of Consumer Advocates’ website) and ask the attorney what to do.
Another
word of advice when dealing with debt collectors: Never fess up until
you have confirmed the validity of the debt and the authenticity of the
collection agency.
Succeeding at standardized tests means owning the books with the answers in them
Standardized
tests aren't tests of basic knowledge. They're branded products
produced by textbook companies, and getting the right answers depends on
whether you studied from the right books.
Small bag of sugar could get neighbors evicted
A woman responsible for what she calls a gesture of kindness is in a lot
of trouble at the Houston, Texas, apartment complex where she lives.
"I went and got some sugar and poured it in this bag," said Faye as she
described how she describing giving sugar to a neighbor who asked to
borrow some.
"He took the sugar and went to his home," she said.
But the problem stems from what someone thought they observed that day.
The person told the officials at the Mansions at Hastings Green that
they had witnessed an exchange of illegal drugs.
Faye found out a few days later when she received a letter accusing her and a male complaining of taking part in a drug transaction.
"And I couldn't believe it," she said. "It was outrageous. I didn't understand it."
Neither did Terry Brown, the neighbor who received the very same letter.
"I came home and I didn't have any soda or anything in my refrigerator," said Brown. "So I came over here to borrow some sugar so I could make me some tea." He insisted there was nothing but sugar in the bag. Brown and Faye have no plans to sign the letter even though it threatens to force them to move out if they don't. "That's fine," said Faye. "I'm not going to sign a lie. I'm not going to sign something I know is not truthful."
Officials with housing say removing someone requires a higher burden of
proof, such as a police report or photographic evidence.
No one at the apartment complex would talk due to privacy concerns. But
the people at the center of this sugary dilemma have plenty to say.
"It's really sad," said Brown.
"It's sad you can't give people sugar or salt or baking soda because the color is white," added Faye.
Both Faye and Brown say they have never used or sold drugs.
"I came home and I didn't have any soda or anything in my refrigerator," said Brown. "So I came over here to borrow some sugar so I could make me some tea." He insisted there was nothing but sugar in the bag. Brown and Faye have no plans to sign the letter even though it threatens to force them to move out if they don't. "That's fine," said Faye. "I'm not going to sign a lie. I'm not going to sign something I know is not truthful."
A 90-year-old lady angry with construction workers held SWAT team at bay with shotgun for hours
A 90-year-old great-grandmother armed with a 12 gauge shotgun held SWAT
officers at bay in Channelview, Texas, for hours on Thursday.
The officers were responding to a 911 call from construction workers
next door who told them she threatened them with the gun.
Deputies say Eleouise Adcock was angry the workers were excavating dirt,
and loading it onto a barge behind her house.
Ms. Adcock has lived on the bank of the San Jacinto River for more than
four decades, but in recent years a marine towing company has moved in
on either side of her house.
“They've bought properties there along the waterfront, and taken down
three to four houses and made room for their equipment and stuff.”
neighbour Sharlene Hathorn said.
Another neighbor said Adcock is the last holdout, refusing to sell her
property, and irritated by the company's repeated attempts to buy it.
“She don't like whats going on over there. She don't want to sell out to
these people here.”
Construction workers called 911 at around 10am saying Adcock was
threatening them with the shotgun.
“They told us she has pointed weapons at them before.” Harris County
Sheriff's Deputy Thomas Gilliland said. “They didn’t tell anyone about
it the first few times. This time they felt she was much more angry about them being here working and excavating the dirt.”
When deputies arrived, she refused to put the gun down as she sat on her porch, holding her weapon in her lap.
The standoff lasted for about four hours, before Adcock began to relax a little.
A sergeant engaged her in conversation while the SWAT team deployed
around her house.
“She talked for a little while, she came and went back into the home,
came back outside and at that point she put the shotgun down,’ Gilliland
said.
SWAT officers rushed the porch, first grabbing the gun, and then her.
Officers appeared to handle Adcock with great care, gently placing their
hands on her back as they escorted her to waiting paramedics.
“She was taken into custody as gently as we could,” Gilliland said.
Because of her age, she was put on a stretcher and taken to the hospital
as a precaution. Deputies say she will get a psychological evaluation.
No charges are expected.
Burglars broke into 21 vegetable shops to steal only tomatoes, leaving cash behind
With the price of tomatoes soaring in India, they are now given bigger
importance than gold or silver for burglars. At Sabzi Mandi, near
Kotwali police station in Dausa, Rajasthan, burglars decamped with close
to 75 kg of tomatoes from various vegetables shops.
As the vegetable vendors went to open their shops on Thursday morning at
6 am they were taken aback when they saw the iron kiosks had been
broken into. Though stunned by the burglary, they were amused when they realized that the burglars had taken only tomatoes. As many as 21 shops
had broken locks.
"As a matter of practice, the shopkeepers leave coins in their cash boxes but they were not touched. Roughly 75 kg of tomatoes were stolen. We have registered a complaint after the retailers complained and are investigating the matter," said an investigative officer of the Kotwali police station. The market is just a few meters away from Kotwali police station.
"We had unloaded the fresh vegetables including tomatoes and onions on Wednesday night and after locking the kiosks and shops, we left at one in the morning on Thursday. The burglars left all other vegetables other than tomatoes," said Radheyshyam, one of the victims of the burglary. Initially, when the shopkeepers approached the nearby Kotwali police station to complain about the matter, policemen also laughed at the development.
"As a matter of practice, the shopkeepers leave coins in their cash boxes but they were not touched. Roughly 75 kg of tomatoes were stolen. We have registered a complaint after the retailers complained and are investigating the matter," said an investigative officer of the Kotwali police station. The market is just a few meters away from Kotwali police station.
"We had unloaded the fresh vegetables including tomatoes and onions on Wednesday night and after locking the kiosks and shops, we left at one in the morning on Thursday. The burglars left all other vegetables other than tomatoes," said Radheyshyam, one of the victims of the burglary. Initially, when the shopkeepers approached the nearby Kotwali police station to complain about the matter, policemen also laughed at the development.
10 Amazing Places To Visit In China That Aren't The Great Wall Or The Terracotta Army
If you are visiting China as a tourist then the likelihood is that at
some point during your stay you will find yourself at the Great Wall.
Yet in this vast country there are hundreds of other places that could
crown a visit for one reason or another.
They may be less well known than the Great Wall or indeed the Terracotta Army but they linger in the minds and hearts of all who visit them. Here are just ten of those amazing places you could visit while in China.
They may be less well known than the Great Wall or indeed the Terracotta Army but they linger in the minds and hearts of all who visit them. Here are just ten of those amazing places you could visit while in China.
Guess Who's Been Waiting In The Lobby For A Hundred Million Years?
Sometimes the quiet ones surprise us. Take moss - those fuzzy green pads
you see on the sides of old trees, or hanging onto rocks. Who notices
moss? It's just there, doing whatever it does - so slowly, so terribly
slowly, that nobody bothers to think about it.
Moss creeps up tree bark, sits quietly on crevasses in rocks. Moss is an old, old life form, one of the earliest plants to attach to land around 450 million years ago. It's very patient, very modest - but when you look closely, you discover it has super powers.
Moss creeps up tree bark, sits quietly on crevasses in rocks. Moss is an old, old life form, one of the earliest plants to attach to land around 450 million years ago. It's very patient, very modest - but when you look closely, you discover it has super powers.
Man accused of assaulting girlfriend and her pet raccoon
A man from Uintah County, Utah, has been charged in connection with an
incident where investigators say he threw his girlfriend and her pet
raccoon against a wall.
David Augilar Tapia, 41, was charged on Friday with assault, a
third-degree felony, and animal cruelty, a class B misdemeanor.
A woman called police on July 14 to report that her boyfriend had
assaulted her inside the home they shared in Ballard.
The woman told officers she and Tapia had been living together for about
two months. They began arguing after Tapia called her by his ex-wife's
name, she said.
The argument escalated, and Tapia grabbed the woman by the arms and threw her against the wall, according to charging documents. "(The woman's) pet raccoon hissed at David, so David grabbed the raccoon by the collar and threw (the animal) into the back room, hitting the wall," the charges state.
The woman was able to leave the residence and get a ride to the emergency room from her ex-husband. She told officers she had suffered at least two broken ribs, according to the charges, which do not include any information about whether the raccoon was injured. Tapia was arrested on July 21 and booked into the Uintah County Jail. His first court appearance is set for Aug. 11.
The argument escalated, and Tapia grabbed the woman by the arms and threw her against the wall, according to charging documents. "(The woman's) pet raccoon hissed at David, so David grabbed the raccoon by the collar and threw (the animal) into the back room, hitting the wall," the charges state.
The woman was able to leave the residence and get a ride to the emergency room from her ex-husband. She told officers she had suffered at least two broken ribs, according to the charges, which do not include any information about whether the raccoon was injured. Tapia was arrested on July 21 and booked into the Uintah County Jail. His first court appearance is set for Aug. 11.
Panda diagnosed as suffering from stress due to square dancing grannies
A panda living at China's Hongshan Zoo has been diagnosed as suffering
from stress after the area outside his cage was taken over by a group of
square dancing grannies.
Elderly ladies wanting to keep fit and taking up square dancing in any
public space have become a mass phenomena in China, with many conflicts
between the dancers and local residents who complain that sometimes the
practice sessions go on into the early hours of the morning.
For their part the pensioners say during the day it is always too busy,
and always too hot as well. They prefer instead to dance in the evening
and sleep during the day.
But that schedule has not gone down well with the panda at the zoo in
the city of Nanjing in eastern China's Jiangsu Province.
The giant panda's keeper Guang Tien, 43, said: "As soon as the music
starts and the women begin dancing, Chaoyang begins pacing back and
forth and is clearly nervous and distressed.
"Just like people, there are some animals that can handle noise, and other animals that get stressed out and anxious. Pandas are one of the animals that really can't handle noise, and after trying to work out why he seems so anxious and of his food lately, we discovered that the cause was the dancers." Zoo director Shen Zhijun said that they had called in experts from the Sichuan-based Ya'an Giant Panda Reserve Center, who discovered that the panda's heartbeat and breathing increased noticeably when Chaoyang heard the women arrived.
He said: "The women also sing very loudly and very badly. Even I can hear them from a long distance away when I am inside with the windows closed. I've tried to persuade them to lower their voices but they refused." Shen said that not just the pandas but also other animals, noticeably the hornbills and giraffes, are also suffering ever since the singing and dancing square dancers have taken up position. He added: "Visitors are complaining, because when the dancers start up the animals go back inside their cages and refused to come out."
"Just like people, there are some animals that can handle noise, and other animals that get stressed out and anxious. Pandas are one of the animals that really can't handle noise, and after trying to work out why he seems so anxious and of his food lately, we discovered that the cause was the dancers." Zoo director Shen Zhijun said that they had called in experts from the Sichuan-based Ya'an Giant Panda Reserve Center, who discovered that the panda's heartbeat and breathing increased noticeably when Chaoyang heard the women arrived.
He said: "The women also sing very loudly and very badly. Even I can hear them from a long distance away when I am inside with the windows closed. I've tried to persuade them to lower their voices but they refused." Shen said that not just the pandas but also other animals, noticeably the hornbills and giraffes, are also suffering ever since the singing and dancing square dancers have taken up position. He added: "Visitors are complaining, because when the dancers start up the animals go back inside their cages and refused to come out."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)