The one thing repugicans never talk about when making
devastating cuts to safety nets are the real world consequences to the
people their cuts impact.…
Consequentialism is the class of normative ethical theories holding
that the consequences of one’s conduct are the ultimate basis for
judgment about the rightness of that conduct. Thus, a morally right act
(or omission from acting) is one that will produce a good outcome and is
commonly summarized as “
the ends justify the means.” The repugicans
have attempted to convince Americans that it is morally right to cut
funding for domestic programs that serve the elderly, children, and the
poor because it produces a good outcome of shrinking the government, and
teaches them there are consequences for getting old, being poor, and
working for low wages. The repugicans have had a measure of success
persuading their supporters that the pursuit of smaller government
justifies cutting domestic programs that serve vulnerable Americans, and
validate the devastating consequences of the their actions by
portraying the poor, children, and seniors as moochers robbing America
of its wealth.
The one thing repugicans never talk about when making devastating
cuts to safety nets are the real world consequences to the people their
cuts impact. No repugican stands on the floor of the House or Senate
and says they need to cut billions from the food stamp program and the
result will be that 48 million Americans will have significantly less
food to eat and go hungry, or that not extending unemployment benefits means
1.3 million Americans lose the lifeline keeping them from falling into
dire poverty. It is much easier to dehumanize the cuts as much-needed
deficit reduction, or reining in the size of government to prevent it
from robbing Americans’ tax dollars and preventing job creators from
recording higher profits that might encourage them to hire more workers.
However, there are human consequences in repugicans’ harsh austerity
that is keeping Americans hungry, homeless, and sick and still, repugicans have fought tooth and nail to make deeper cuts and keep
their precious sequester in place.
The sequester is directly responsible for increased hunger,
homelessness, and sickness among the poor, but there is little mention
of its effects that are literally killing Americans. Last month it was
reported that sequester cuts were killing homeless Americans
forced to live on the streets in freezing winter weather due to cuts to
the Section 8 housing assistance program. Over the weekend, sequester
cuts to the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program (
LIHEAP)
that assists low income households meet their home energy needs were
responsible for deaths of three children in the Midwest. LIHEAP
particularly helps Americans with the lowest incomes that pay a high
proportion of that income for home energy, especially for heating during
the winter months.
The three children lived in Hammond, Indiana where most residents
were able to keep the bitter cold at bay by turning up their heat to
stay warm against freezing temperatures. That was not the case for Andre
Young’s family whose rented house had been without electricity, gas,
and water for 6 months, and had barely survived the frigid winter
weather by using a
propane space heater until January 8
th.
At about 10:30 that night witnesses said Young ran in to his burning
rented house to rescue his five children and was successful saving a
two-year-old and a six-year-old before he was burned seriously and
collapsed in the snow. Another man attempted to kick down a door and
save three remaining children aged four, three, and seven months, but he
was unsuccessful. By the time first responders arrived they found the
three and four-year-old in each other’s embrace and the seven-month old
nearby; all three children perished.
Mr. Young, who works in lawn care, remains hospitalized in
critical condition
and his wife, a Walmart worker until recently, did not earn enough
money to afford rent, food, and still make their utility payments. They
were forced to choose food and shelter over heat, and the consequence of
their choice was three dead children and a critically-burned father. It
is likely that repugicans are still patting each other on the back for
successfully implementing the sequester to “
rein in spending” and “
cut the size of government,” and look longingly forward to nine more years of austerity cuts with no regard for the costs in human terms.
In November, the National Energy Association Directors’ Alliance (
NEADA) released a
report
citing the sequester had cut 330,000 poor families from energy
assistance heading into the winter season. The report said the outlook
for poor families during the heating season was grim with colder
weather, higher energy costs, and declining purchasing power due to
declining incomes and low wages. NEADA reported that the number of
households receiving home heating assistance declined in fiscal year
2013, and noted that the sequester cuts were on top of severe cuts to
the program since 2010. All told, nearly 1.5 million households lost
heating assistance, and the outlook is especially bleak since the Energy
Information Administration projected the average cost of home heating
increased from $922 to $977 that leaves most Americans working for
poverty wages with a choice of eating or staying warm. It is a choice
forced on them by cruel repugicans and their precious life-ending sequester.
In the town the Young family lives, Hammond, money provided by the
federal low-income energy assistance program (LIHEAP) is administered by
the North Township Trustee and can give amounts between $100 and $500
starting in October to individuals and families living in poverty if
funding is available. The Indiana utility, NIPSCO, confirmed Young was
on some form of assistance, though it did not specify which kind, but
with five children and rent to pay, it was likely food stamps that were
cut two months ago on November 1st. An average household in Indiana
house
spends about $530 on heat between November and March which is significantly more than the assistance provided, and experts
warned that the frigid weather from the “Polar Vortex,” coupled with devastating
sequester cuts
that have already reduced the amount of LIHEAP assistance available
will push those on heating assistance to the limits of their budgets and
force them to choose feeding their families or keeping them warm.
The repugicans love boasting to their inhumane followers that “
reining in spending” and “
cutting the size of government”
justifies their cuts that are killing poor Americans struggling to
survive in poverty. One might be inclined to say the Young family’s
tragedy is a cautionary tale of what dire consequences result from repugican austerity, but it is a stark reality that is recurring all
across America with no apparent end in sight. The repugicans are well-aware
of the devastation their senseless and barbaric cuts are wreaking on
the most vulnerable Americans and yet they are dissatisfied the damage
is not severe enough or they would not continue panting to make deeper
cuts to social safety nets.
The consequences of repugican austerity are the ultimate basis for
judgment about the rightness of their conduct, and in human terms, their
conduct is beyond wrong, it is inhumane, immoral, and sheer evil. Their
jobs as legislators, according to the U.S. Constitution, is to provide
for the general welfare of the people, and yet their standard practice
is inflicting pain and suffering first on the most vulnerable Americans
with more of their attention being shifted to the declining middle
class. It is a sad state of affairs that repugicans would
withhold heating assistance,
food, and adequate housing from those who need it most and never
acknowledge the consequences of their actions. As their austerity drives
more Americans to choose between shelter, food, and heating in
inclement weather, more poor Americans will opt to feed their families
and use dangerous propane stoves to keep warm and suffer the
deadly consequences of repugicans’ reining in spending and cutting the size of government.
Today is - Pooh (Winnie the) Day 
