For the first time in this mid-term election cycle,
South Carolina politics suddenly got interesting. The state’s just been
politically “Ervinized.” But, first, a little background.
Make no mistake, ‘trounce’ will still be the South
Carolina post-election catchphrase of the day come November 4th as most repugicans in this pitiful-wingnut state will take measure of
their massively outspent Democratic opponents by easy double-digits.
These feelings of dominance and invincibility may be tempered however,
by one race that seemed to be a walkover that is no longer a walkover.
You all know the back story of the South Carolina
governor’s race. The current governor, Nikki Haley, an American
Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) puppet, wants to continue the states
abysmally low rankings in almost every social and practical category of
meaning. As I’ve written many times before, in a highly competitive
field, Haley is, based on these rankings alone, the nation’s most inept
governor. But, in the Palmetto state all that’s required of a governor
is hate.
In its hatred of the federal government, the state
has sacrificed hundreds of millions for vital educational and health
programs. Nonetheless, hating the feds is an imperative, as is
deep-seated racism as reflected in Haley’s abhorrence of “Obamacare”,
not to mention Obama, himself. Let’s not forget hatred of gays. “It don’
make no difference what them liberal judges say, we ain’t lettin’ no
gays git married in South Carolina.”
And unions? Don’t even get Haley started on unions.
She’s already publicly pledged to block every attempt to unionize in the
state. As quoted, “Union jobs aren’t welcome here.” Jobs that are
welcome are those pieces of workplace pathos offered by greedy
multi-nationals that are descending on the state like a massive swarm of
locusts. Jobs that are assured to be non-union lest these companies
have to pay living wages, guarantee safe working conditions and decent
hours.
When not selecting South Carolina, the corporate
biggies might actually have to pay taxes on U.S. profits in the U.S.
instead of merging with some low-tax overseas corporate outfit of
questionable character to create a phony “headquarters” to avoid
American taxes.
Then there’s Haley’s arrogant disdain of human life
in refusing to expand Medicaid to a certain group of low-wage earners. A
move that is not only heartless, but will kill people. A Harvard study
estimates as many as 1,300 annually in South Carolina alone. What kind
of governor doesn’t care about killing people? We should throw her
‘hatred’ of environmental regulations into the mix. Regulations that
minimize and control chemical releases that kill who knows how many of
her fellow citizens.
This is not only a worthless, unfeeling governor;
this is a worthless, unfeeling human being. And yet she commands
comfortable double-digit leads in virtually every legitimate poll over
her holdover opponent from her last gubernatorial run, State Senator,
Vincent Sheheen.
Back to Ervinized and why that recent phenomenon is
suddenly creating a modest opening for Sheheen in the governor’s race.
Those who have followed this race are aware that there are five
candidates. The two major parties, Independent repugican petition
candidate, Tom Ervin and two political ciphers. The latter two are
meaningless in terms of the outcome. Ervin is definitely meaningful,
especially in light of recent developments. Tom Ervin is a 62-year-old
former two-term state house member as a Democrat and a 14-year circuit
court judge who currently practices law with his wife. He is
philosophically still a moderate Democrat, though a few years ago, he
declared himself a repugican to run for a couple of offices he craved.
He lost both elections, but remained a repugican. Given that Haley won
the repugican primary, Ervin was, by law, forced to run as an
Independent in the general election.
He was a very effective candidate, giving both the
major party candidates a dressing down on assorted issues. He was
especially hard on Haley. His presence created vote switching that one
would think would benefit Sheheen, the Democrat. As indicated earlier,
while Ervin gained supporters, Sheheen lost them and Haley made a big
move.
Now, all that could change. The ball, as they say,
is squarely in Sheheen’s court. Ervin, who funded his own campaign to
the tune of $4 million, suddenly dropped out of the race freeing roughly
8-10% of the total vote. I guess he felt he had made enough of an
impression on the electorate and fully realized that, while certainly
influential, he stood no chance of winning. One of his first
post-dropout steps was to email an expression of strong support to
Sheheen contributors under the Sheheen letterhead. The obvious question
is, what difference will it make? Won’t repugican Ervin votes simply
find a home in the Haley camp?
Maybe, but, as in TV reality shows, there’s a twist.
Ervin has officially endorsed Sheheen. Some voters are now going to
take a close look at why. In a local phone interview with reporter Jason
Spencer, Ervin made the following statement, “It was a difficult
decision, but I felt like it was time to put aside my personal ambition
and try to do what’s best for our state.” Gee, what a novel approach to
public service.
And Ervin has spelled out three reasons that it
makes more sense to vote for the Democratic State Senator. According to
the local press, those reasons are, ethics reform, domestic violence and
economic development. He actually used the word “dishonest” in
condemning Haley’s leadership on the issues.
The Haley camp provided a predictably snarky
response that, of course, involved no substance whatsoever nor did it
address Ervin’s concerns. Instead, deputy campaign manager Rob Godfrey,
released the following statement, designed to push all the right-wing
voter buttons. “Tom Ervin, Vince Sheheen and their LIBERAL TRIAL LAWYER
CRONIES have always had the same agenda in this campaign. They have
spent millions on false and shameful attacks and gotten nowhere with
South Carolina voters. It’s no surprise that two PRO-OBAMACARE TRIAL
LAWYERS would officially tie the knot at the end of the race.”
Not a peep about ethics reform, domestic violence and economic development.
Interesting response, but it will only be swallowed
whole by those who are already in the Haley camp. Reasonable voters from
both parties are going to wonder why there’s no rebuttal to Ervin’s
issue concerns. They may even (GASP) do some research. I happened to
talk with a state representative friend of mine today and consensus
among his colleagues is that Ervin supporters are not happy with the
move. Ergo, they may show their displeasure by simply staying home.
Bottom line, who does that benefit?
I still expect Sheheen to lose, but by a narrower
margin than I had earlier predicted. What does change is that, unlike
Sheheen’s earlier predicament, there is an outside chance of an upset,
unlikely, but not impossible when you add a majority of the 12%
undecided vote. So thank you Mr. Legislator, judge, trial lawyer and
straight talker, you just made things a lot more interesting.
In one race, at least.
BTW Democrats, please vote November 4th.
