If Arizona repugicans are successful a new bill will give
any Arizonan the right to break any law with impunity …
It is beyond dispute that throughout world history most of the
atrocities on the human race were committed in the name of religion
whether it was the Holocaust, Crusades, Inquisition, witch hunts, or
near extermination of aboriginal people by christian imperialists. Wingnuts and their repugican facilitators attack women’s rights
and persecute the gay community in the name of religion and claim they
are protected by the First Amendment’s freedom to exercise religion as
they see fit. The judicial system is being inundated with cases of
anti-gay discrimination and attempts to control women under the guise of
religious freedom, and if Arizona repugicans are successful a new bill
will give any Arizonan the right to break any law with impunity if it
is in the name of religion.
The piece of legislation that passed out of the Arizona state senate committee this week,
S.B. 1062,
allows discrimination against gays for any reason if it is founded on a
religious belief. The bill is sponsored by repugican Steve Yarborough,
who attempted to legalize discrimination last year, and it was
described
then by The New Civil Rights Movement as the religious “
stand your ground” law, but it is much worse than religious license to discriminate. In Yarborough’s bill, the definition of “
exercise
of religion means PRACTICE OR OBSERVANCE OF RELIGION, INCLUDING THE
ability to act or refusal to act in a manner substantially motivated by a
religious belief, whether or not the exercise is compulsory or central
to a larger system of religious belief.” It is precisely the
argument Hobby Lobby is using to refuse birth control coverage for women
and Utah is using to deny same-sex couples equal protection under the
law to marry the person they love.
On its face, SB 1062 appears to give Arizona residents and businesses
legal cover to refuse service to anyone for any reason, but it is
far-reaching in its scope including extending First Amendment religious
protections by “
expanding the definition of person to include any
individual, association, partnership, corporation, church, estate,
trust, foundation or other legal entity.” The bill eliminates the Constitution’s equal rights protections and is a “
get of jail”
free card for anyone who does anything in the name of religion. It will
not end with protecting christians who discriminate against the LGBT
community, or shielding christian employers who withhold contraception
coverage in health plans.
Yarborough’s legislation is the ultimate “
conscience clause”
because it gives any individual, cult, business, medical professional,
trust or estate, or simple association legal protection to discriminate
against anyone if they claim doing so is part of their religious
belief. What it means is if a business owner is opposed to gays and a
couple walks into his restaurant, he can refuse to serve them,
physically assault them, and literally throw them out of his
establishment if he claims “
the bible made him do it.”
Yarborough’s legislation means he cannot be prosecuted for assault,
discrimination, or violating the Constitution if he claims he was
exercising religion. However, it will not stop there. For example, if a
homeowner’s association wants to keep non-white people from moving into
their neighborhood they could ban realtors from selling or renting homes
to minorities, or evict minorities from their homes on grounds that
African Americans, Asians, or Hispanics living in their vicinity
violates their First Amendment free exercise of religion.
The Arizona legislation, if it becomes law, would effectively void
the Constitution’s equal rights protections, eliminate
anti-discrimination laws, and restrict the religious freedom of
non-christians just to name a few. It would give any entity, business,
trust, or association the right to refuse to serve members of other
religions, or ban them from a city if city leaders said it was against
their religion to allow other faiths inside city boundaries. It is by no
means a stretch of the imagination to believe that an Arizona citizen,
business, church, association, or militia group would follow the bible’s
commandment to stone gays or murder unmarried women cohabitating with a
man if they knew citing religious freedom protected them from
prosecution. The bill ultimately protects any religious person or group
from arrest or prosecution for any heinous act if they claimed allowing
someone to exercise their Constitutional right inhibited their exercise
of religion. If the legislation becomes law it means religion is a “get
out of jail” free card or legal justification to break any law including
murder or violating the Constitution if it is founded on their
religious belief.
Yarborough’s legislation is the iteration of what the religio-wingnuts
have been attempting to do for the past thirty years since Reagan gave
them power to affect legislation to follow the bible. S.B. 1062 is the
law christians lust for to replace the Constitution that prohibits christian extremists from imposing their will on the entire population
under the guise of “religious liberty.” This is not the first time
Yarborough has introduced legislation giving “
religious license to discriminate against gays,” and he told a reporter he is very aware that “
his
bill could be used to discriminate against not only gay people, but
also unmarried women, or people with different religious beliefs,” or that it “
could actually allow religion to be used to justify breaking any law in Arizona.”
According to Yarborough, his bill does not infringe on people’s
rights. He claims it is no different than pharmacists who are protected
from dispensing the “
morning after pill to women if it violates their religious beliefs,”
but it is too far-reaching in its scope and literally legalizes any
action, whether discrimination or biblical stoning, if the person or
group of persons claims it is part of their “exercise of religion.” It
is the kind of law the religious right pants over to give them authority
to rule by theocracy, and an indication of what they have in mind when
they say it is long-past time to revisit the First Amendment and clarify
what “
free exercise” of religion means.
Last year Arizona Governor Jan Brewer
vetoed
an identical Yarborough bill as part of her vendetta against the
legislature for not passing a budget, but with no vendetta on the
horizon, there is a very good possibility Brewer will sign the bill into
law when it passes the Arizona legislature again. Americans would be
foolish to think that Yarborough’s legislation will not catch on in
other states. It is important to remember that Arizona is by no means
the most religious state in the Union, and the idea behind his bill is
the impetus for the Hobby Lobby case due to be ruled on by the Supreme
Court this year, as well as the Utah Mormon appeal to continue its ban
on same-sex marriages. The religio-wingnuts have spent the past five years
arguing that their Constitutional freedom to exercise religion includes
forcing compliance with bible edicts on the rest of the population, and
if any American thinks it will end with christians banning
contraception or same-sex marriage, they have not been paying attention
to calls to revert to biblical punishment for any number of scriptural
violations.
The Constitution is clear that government cannot infringe on any
Americans’ right to exercise religion, but the religious rights wants to
alter definition of “exercise religion” to give them legal cover to
infringe on every other Americans’ right to their Constitutional
protections. There is no good outcome of legislation like Arizona’s SB
1062, and no American should be deluded that extremists would stop at
taking religious license to discriminate against gays, because the christian bible is rife with atrocities against the human race. With
protection from prosecution based on free exercise of religion, and a
religious text full of commands to exterminate non-believers, the bible
is just the guide christian fundamentalists will use to
stone gays,
women, and members of other religions if one horrifying Arizona bill
catches on in truly religious states, and replaces the Constitution.