by Allen Clifton
Wingnuts
like to go on and on about the horrific policies of the Obama
administration and how terrible Democrats are. But something that I seem
to always notice is missing is what
their party has done for them.
See, as a liberal who voted for President Obama, I can tell you what he’s done for this country:
- Created over 10 million jobs
- Presided over record high stock levels
- Found and killed Osama bin Ladin
- Passed health care reform
- Saved the American auto industry
To just name a few, out
of the long list of things that he’s done. These are quantifiable things that I can point to and say, “See, this is what
my party did for me.”
Though conservatives will undoubtedly scoff at all of those. Because
as we all know when it comes to wingnuts, if Faux News doesn’t say
it, it’s not real.
But when it’s all said and done, what the hell has their party done for them?
Let’s get a couple of social issues out of the way:
Outside of the people directly involved in a same-sex wedding, or an
abortion, how exactly does that impact anyone else’s life? The answer is
simple: It doesn’t. So, continuing to fight for these social issues
isn’t “doing something” to improve the lives of the wingnut voter.
It’s just a power play based on some ignorant desire to control
strangers based on what
they believe is right or wrong. But
even if same-sex marriages and abortions were illegal, that doesn’t
“improve” the life of the average wingnut voter. Sure, it gives
them a “win,” but it’s not doing something for
them. Because
the typical wingnut voter wasn’t going to have an abortion or marry
a homosexual in the first place. So whether or not those two things are
legal has absolutely no direct impact on their life. (Unless of course
they’re a hypocrite and rally against things that secretly they would
do, just to save face with their wingnuttery or 'christian' delusions.)
So, again, what has the repugican cabal done for the wingnut
voter? Has this “trickle-down” economics made them rich? And don’t give
me this “well Democrats keep preventing it from working properly”
nonsense. Taxes have remained at all-time lows since Reagan. The rich
are doing better than they ever have in this country. Many large
corporations are making
billions. So don’t give me this crap
about taxes or regulations. If those were really burdens to our economy,
then the rich would be suffering too.
And they’re not. In fact,
they’re flourishing.
Is it guns? Because as far as I can tell, President Obama hasn’t
passed a single law to strip away gun rights. Actually, the only
suggestions he really made were universal background checks and limits
on magazine size. And I’m sorry, but if you can’t hit a target with 10
bullets, you shouldn’t be operating a gun in the first place. And why
would anyone oppose universal background checks? Have we become so
paranoid in this country that we can’t wait a week for a gun? If you
really believe your life is in that much immediate danger you either
need to call 911 or seek professional help.
Besides, are gun rights really an issue on which you want to support
an entire political party? How does that make sense? Vote against your
own best interests in nearly every other facet of your life because you
get to own more guns and get them a few days quicker than if the other
party was in charge? Sure, you’ve got a safe full of guns – while you
work 60 hours a week at two jobs for $7.25 an hour because the party you
vote for refuses to raise the minimum wage. Yeah, that makes perfect
sense.
And if I’m not mistaken (and I’m not) didn’t the shrub tell us back in the
early 2000′s that his tax cuts were going to usher in economic
prosperity and eliminate our national debt? So, how exactly did the
opposite of that happen? That’s right, because trickle-down economics is scam.
Is it this fear-mongering against people on welfare? Wingnuts do realize that millions of
wingnuts are
on welfare, right? And when it gets right down to it, welfare abuse
makes up a very small percentage of those receiving these benefits. But
this also ties into the minimum wage issue. Because millions of American
workers have full-time jobs, yet still rely on the government to
survive. And as much as it “pains” me to say this, mostly repugican
states lead the nation when it comes to citizens relying on government
assistance.
Women’s rights? Please. Female wingnuts, please explain to me what the repugican cabal has done to secure true equality for women in America.
Then there’s always health care. After all, repugicans really tried
to fix our broken health care system, right? Isn’t it amazing how
suddenly “Obamacare” is some social radical idea, yet it was a repugican idea in the 90′s? In fact, the 2012 repugican presidential
candidate, Mitt Romney, passed nearly the exact same law while he was
governor of Massachusetts. But I guess once the black guy supported the
law,
then it became “evil socialism.” And to this day, even
with all of their objections to “Obamacare,” repugicans have yet to
provide a single plausible alternative.
Except, of course, “Obamacare.”
Oh, and for the record, all of the propaganda repugicans use against the Affordable Care Act:
- Canceled plans
- Kills jobs
- Premium hikes
- Confusing
Those are actually all arguments as to why we need true universal health care for all.
The shrub pretended for eight years and repugicans had control of
most of Congress for much of his time in Washington. What did wingnut voters get from it?
Is Iraq better off? No. Did we balance the budget? No. Did we pay off
our national debt? No. Did we find Osama bin Ladin? No. Did we usher in
unheralded economic prosperity? No. Did we “win the war on terror”? No.
Tell me, what the heck did repugicans do for anyone but the rich
during the shrub’s eight years? The only people who really prospered during
his time in the White House were the wealthy, big business, big oil and
big defense. That was it.
So, wingnut voter, I ask of you: What the hell has the repugican cabal actually done for you?