The inspiration for Hobby Lobby, and 71 other "religious"
corporations, to sue for a religious exemption of the contraception
mandate is not about abortion, but about controlling women…
Religion, particularly the judeo-christian
religions, is now, and has always been about controlling human beings
under the guise of worshipping a deity. If it was not about controlling
the masses, why in dog’s name do those religion’s deity and holy books
include death sentences for failure to worship an unseen deity imposed
on all humanity? Pain of death, either immediate or in the bizarre
concept of afterlife, is a powerful motivator and although there is not
yet a threat of mass extermination of non-believers like in the christian bible’s old testament, fundamentalist christians still insist
on imposing negative consequences for failure to comply with their
edicts.
The idea that certain actions fundamentalist christians oppose on religious grounds warrant immediate and life-long
consequences is the driving force behind the religio-wingnuts'
opposition to both abortion and contraceptive use. On the day the
Supreme Court ruling in Hobby Lobby was announced, a christian lunatic, Erick Erickson, gleefully announced that now, “My religion trumps your (women) right to sex without consequences.”
A similar concept drove the opposition to including contraception
coverage in the Affordable Care Act that House repugicans believed
warranted an all-male panel of clergy to testify that yes, women having
sexual relations without lifelong consequences was an abomination their puritanical sensibilities would not comport.
The inspiration for Hobby Lobby, and 71 other “religious”
corporations, to sue for a religious exemption of the contraception
mandate is not about abortion, but about controlling women and
inflicting consequences for not adhering to their puritanical delusion
that women in their employ, can not, and will not, have sexual relations
without paying a heavy price. In fact, the idea of forcing women, on
pain of harsh consequences, to adhere to strict religious and moral
behavior defined by sententious and severe piety is why fundamentalist christianity is every bit as harsh as islamic sharia law’s control over
women.
Controlling women’s morality was not always the christian wingnuts' cause célèbre, but as is always the case, they did
seek to control
a large segment of the population and enforce another form of biblical
purity. Prior to imposing their puritanical immorality on women, the “
moral(less) (non)majority’s primary mission” was fighting for Aryan racial purity according to, like the mormon cult, the biblical edict that “
black skinned”
people were accursed by god. The religio-wingnuts shifted their outrage
and fight against racial segregation to abortion and contraception when
the Supreme Court
decision in Green v. Kennedy in 1970 stripped the tax-exempt status from private christian schools known as “
segregation academies” that openly barred black students continued unabated despite the Brown v. Board of Education ruling.
It did not take long for the religio-wingnuts to
shift from enforcing biblical racial purity to imposing puritanical
immoral purity targeting American women. Before shifting to control
women’s sexuality, the christian wingnuts followed their god of the old testament’s issuance that there is NO living being until it breathes air.
In fact, the official position of the religio-wingnuts was that a
woman’s choice to use contraception or abortion was a personal decision
between a woman and her physician; the “pro-choice” position the religio-wingnuts now oppose vehemently.
The concept of controlling women and imposing
lifelong consequences for having sex was apparently settled in 1965 when
Planned Parenthood of Connecticut won a U.S. Supreme Court victory,
Griswold v. Connecticut, that finally and completely rolled back state and local laws that had
outlawed
the use of contraception by married couples. Indeed, the same warped puritanical mindset that drives the religio-wingnuts' attempt to control
women, and their sexuality, today erupted immediately after dependably
effective
birth control pills were made available. The argument that religion “
trumps”
a woman’s right to have sexual relations without consequence embraced
by the wingnut 'christian' Supreme Court and religio-wingnuts today
was rampant until Griswald, and then Green v. Kennedy, when the moral
majority found abortion as a new means of political power. The election
of an African American man as President, gave the racist immoral minority
an assist in marshaling racial animus against Obama to their cause to
control women and the Court’s ruling is having a profound effect.
The High Court’s ruling is already
inciting 'christian' organizations to exert their newfound control over
the population as reported here when catholic and christian “
faith leaders”
issued a letter to President Obama demanding religious exemption to
discriminate against gays. The faith leaders insisted that Hobby Lobby
informs the President that he must now give “
deference to christian prerogatives” in any future Presidential action. On Thursday, yet another wingnut 'christian' High Court
birth control order sided with a religiously “
affiliated”
non-profit group after it appealed, and won, an exemption to provide
contraception coverage in health insurance prescription plans. The
former acting solicitor general in the Clinton administration said of
the Hobby Lobby and most recent attack on women that “
After today,
it is clear that women’s access to contraception is by no means
guaranteed given the administrative complexities the court has now
imposed.” The High Court’s newest emergency ruling ceding control
over women, their sexuality, and reproductive health to 'christians' and
is a portent of the pain the repugican religio-wingnuts are about to
unleash in their indisputable and puritanical war on women.
The idea of anti-contraception being an integral
part of the christian wingnuts agenda was implied in Justice Alito’s
writing for the Hobby Lobby decision. And to no-one’s surprise, Justice
Scalia’s wife is a “
hardline anti-choice activist”
that certainly influenced his vote to authorize 'christian' corporations
to withhold contraceptive coverage from prescription drug plans. At the
(no)Right to Life conference, a featured speaker, Joy Pinto,
mercilessly attacked contraceptives as “
the real war on women” she claimed was “
coming from the pit of Hell” comparing birth control to “
when Eve bit the apple.”
A preeminent 'christian' anti-choice website, (anti)Life News, could barely
contain its glee at the prospect of 'christians' legally depriving women
of contraception and stated, “
Fertility is a natural condition of a woman” and that
“stifling ovulation with birth control”
is an abomination to god. However, the 'christian' opposition to birth
control is not about fertility, but about controlling women’s sexuality
by imposing harsh consequences unless they intend to give birth.
It is important for all women, even hardcore wingnuts, catholics, and so-called “good” christians, to remember
that the puritanical religio-wingnuts make no distinction in their war
on women who use contraception. Their goal is simply to exert their
control and force every woman in America to either become celibate or
perpetual birth machines; the consequence of having sexual relations
without contraceptives. American women should never delude themselves
that imposing their puritanical immorality is reserved for single women,
because there was no special dispensation in the Court’s ruling to
protect married women’s access to contraceptives. The christian wingnutst,
including the United States Coven of catholic Bishops (USCcB), makes
no secret that their goal is ultimate control over all women, married
and single alike.
Over the past five years, the preponderance of
opinions among liberals was that religion cannot exert its will over the
government or the people because “it is unconstitutional,” or
they just did not care about religion, or that recent victories for gay
rights proved the religio-wingnuts were in decline and impotent. Well, now
it is constitutional, and the recent victories for gay rights are being
challenged on the grounds of the High Court’s Hobby Lobby ruling. It
has not been a week since the decision was announced and religious “affiliated”
groups quickly sought, and won, the right to withhold contraceptives
from women’s prescription plans and the White House has been warned to
give deference to “christian prerogatives” in any Presidential action.
If anyone thinks this is not a monumental escalation
in the religious war against Americans, particularly women, then why
are men not being denied prescription coverage for penis pumps,
erection-inducing pills, or over-the-counter condoms? This is a
religious assault on women, and gays, that the religio-wingnuts will
expand according to christian dominionism to seize control over all
aspects of American society. At a time when many Americans are
expressing patriotic fervor, they should temper that patriotism with the
reality that there is a powerful and constitutionally backed group
expressing what is arguably the most dangerous threat to America;
religious fervor. History shows when religious zeal is expressed by
fundamentalist christians, it is an existential threat that the Court
just gave its blessing and constitutional authority to proceed with
extreme prejudice. This is not going to end well for any American woman.
