What The Hell Have repugicans Really Done For wingnut Voters?

by Allen Clifton

Wingnuts like to go on and on about the horrific policies of the Obama administration and how terrible Democrats are. But something that I seem to always notice is missing is what their party has done for them.
See, as a liberal who voted for President Obama, I can tell you what he’s done for this country:

• Created over 10 million jobs
• Presided over record high stock levels
• Found and killed Osama bin Ladin
• Passed health care reform
• Saved the American auto industry

To just name a few, out of the long list of things that he’s done. These are quantifiable things that I can point to and say, “See, this is what my party did for me.”
Though conservatives will undoubtedly scoff at all of those. Because as we all know when it comes to wingnuts, if Faux News doesn’t say it, it’s not real.
But when it’s all said and done, what the hell has their party done for them?
Let’s get a couple of social issues out of the way:

• Gay marriage
• Abortion

Outside of the people directly involved in a same-sex wedding, or an abortion, how exactly does that impact anyone else’s life? The answer is simple: It doesn’t. So, continuing to fight for these social issues isn’t “doing something” to improve the lives of the wingnut voter. It’s just a power play based on some ignorant desire to control strangers based on what they believe is right or wrong. But even if same-sex marriages and abortions were illegal, that doesn’t “improve” the life of the average wingnut voter. Sure, it gives them a “win,” but it’s not doing something for them. Because the typical wingnut voter wasn’t going to have an abortion or marry a homosexual in the first place. So whether or not those two things are legal has absolutely no direct impact on their life. (Unless of course they’re a hypocrite and rally against things that secretly they would do, just to save face with their wingnuttery or 'christian' delusions.)
So, again, what has the repugican cabal done for the wingnut voter? Has this “trickle-down” economics made them rich? And don’t give me this “well Democrats keep preventing it from working properly” nonsense. Taxes have remained at all-time lows since Reagan. The rich are doing better than they ever have in this country. Many large corporations are making billions. So don’t give me this crap about taxes or regulations. If those were really burdens to our economy, then the rich would be suffering too.
And they’re not. In fact, they’re flourishing.
Is it guns? Because as far as I can tell, President Obama hasn’t passed a single law to strip away gun rights. Actually, the only suggestions he really made were universal background checks and limits on magazine size. And I’m sorry, but if you can’t hit a target with 10 bullets, you shouldn’t be operating a gun in the first place. And why would anyone oppose universal background checks? Have we become so paranoid in this country that we can’t wait a week for a gun? If you really believe your life is in that much immediate danger you either need to call 911 or seek professional help.
Besides, are gun rights really an issue on which you want to support an entire political party? How does that make sense? Vote against your own best interests in nearly every other facet of your life because you get to own more guns and get them a few days quicker than if the other party was in charge? Sure, you’ve got a safe full of guns – while you work 60 hours a week at two jobs for $7.25 an hour because the party you vote for refuses to raise the minimum wage. Yeah, that makes perfect sense.
And if I’m not mistaken (and I’m not) didn’t the shrub tell us back in the early 2000′s that his tax cuts were going to usher in economic prosperity and eliminate our national debt? So, how exactly did the opposite of that happen? That’s right, because trickle-down economics is scam.
Is it this fear-mongering against people on welfare? Wingnuts do realize that millions of wingnuts are on welfare, right? And when it gets right down to it, welfare abuse makes up a very small percentage of those receiving these benefits. But this also ties into the minimum wage issue. Because millions of American workers have full-time jobs, yet still rely on the government to survive. And as much as it “pains” me to say this, mostly repugican states lead the nation when it comes to citizens relying on government assistance.
Women’s rights? Please. Female wingnuts, please explain to me what the repugican cabal has done to secure true equality for women in America.
Then there’s always health care. After all, repugicans really tried to fix our broken health care system, right? Isn’t it amazing how suddenly “Obamacare” is some social radical idea, yet it was a repugican idea in the 90′s? In fact, the 2012 repugican presidential candidate, Mitt Romney, passed nearly the exact same law while he was governor of Massachusetts. But I guess once the black guy supported the law, then it became “evil socialism.” And to this day, even with all of their objections to “Obamacare,” repugicans have yet to provide a single plausible alternative.
Except, of course, “Obamacare.”
Oh, and for the record, all of the propaganda repugicans use against the Affordable Care Act:

• Canceled plans
• Kills jobs
• Premium hikes
• Confusing

Those are actually all arguments as to why we need true universal health care for all.
The shrub pretended for eight years and repugicans had control of most of Congress for much of his time in Washington. What did wingnut voters get from it?
Is Iraq better off? No. Did we balance the budget? No. Did we pay off our national debt? No. Did we find Osama bin Ladin? No. Did we usher in unheralded economic prosperity? No. Did we “win the war on terror”? No.
Tell me, what the heck did repugicans do for anyone but the rich during the shrub’s eight years? The only people who really prospered during his time in the White House were the wealthy, big business, big oil and big defense. That was it.
So, wingnut voter, I ask of you: What the hell has the repugican cabal actually done for you?