Welcome to ...

The place where the world comes together in honesty and mirth.
Windmills Tilted, Scared Cows Butchered, Lies Skewered on the Lance of Reality ... or something to that effect.


Monday, February 23, 2009

Environmental News

From New Scientist:

Ancient civilizations may have given us a carbon boost

Can we thank past civilizations for the way tropical rainforests are soaking up our carbon pollution? A new analysis of tree growth and death in 79 plots across tropical Africa finds that every hectare is soaking up an average 0.6 tonnes of carbon from the air per year.

The findings of the international study, reported by Simon Lewis of the University of Leeds, UK, mirror past discoveries of the huge carbon-absorbing ability of the Amazon rainforest. Together, they confirm estimates from atmospheric chemists that natural tropical forests absorb about a fifth of our carbon emissions.

The researchers followed the growth of some 250,000 trees over 40 years. After allowing for trees that died, they estimate that African tropical forests are absorbing a total of 340 million tonnes of carbon a year.

This huge "carbon sink" in the tropical rainforests roughly counterbalances releases from mankind's destruction of tropical rainforests by burning, logging and clearing. Though, as IPCC scientist Chris Field of Stanford University warned at the American Association for the Advancement of Science conference in Chicago at the weekend (see our updates from the conference), they could soon be swamped by carbon releases from raging fires in the forests as a result of climate change.

But what caused the sink? Mature forests should be carbon-neutral in theory, releasing as much as they absorb. Helene Muller-Landau of the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute in Panama, suggests the forests could still be regrowing after partial destruction by past civilisations, such as pre-Columbian Amazon cities and ancient African iron-making societies. They are, she says, "far from being pristine wildernesses."

But Lewis thinks the similar results from both forests suggest a global influence - "probably the fertilising effect of the rising levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere".

No comments: