Oh, so, now they’re worried.
The insurance industry did a lot of crying about Obamacare, even though we’ve known for a while it was going to be big business for them. Now they’re crying because – heaven forbid! – a Romney victory, along with a repugican-controlled House, might mean chaos for their business as the repugican cabal attempts to follow through on its threat to repeal health care reform.
Poor babies, right?
Despite all of the talk by repugicans about how disruptive Democrats are for business, it sure sounds like it’s the repugicans who are the making life unpredictable for business. This time for the insurance industry.
In truth, the repugicans are loose cannons and everyone knows it – remember, it was repugican threats not to pass the debt ceiling increase that caused the US’ credit rating to be downgraded.
From National Journal:
The big new element on Friday was an official outside recognition that U.S. creditworthiness is being undermined by a new factor: political insanity. S&P didn’t base its downgrade on a change in the U.S. fiscal and economic outlook. It based it on the political game of chicken over the debt ceiling, a game that repugicans initiated and pushed to the limit, and on a growing gloom about the partisan deadlock. Part of S&P’s gloom, moreover, stemmed explicitly from what a new assessment of the repugican cabal’s ability to block any and all tax increases.And now Big Insurance has suddenly woken up to the fact that repugican insanity is bad for business. Maybe they should have thought about that before joining the repugican cabal in ripping Obamacare.
S&P was remarkably blunt that its downgrade was mostly about heightened political risks: “The political brinksmanship of recent months highlights what we see as America’s governance and policymaking becoming less stable, less effective, and less predictable than what we previously believed,” it said….
To be sure, S&P didn’t specifically single out repugicans. It criticized the overall $2.4 trillion deal as too limited, and it implicitly criticized both political parties for refusing to tackle their sacred cows – entitlements, in the case of Democrats; tax increases in the case of repugicans.
But it’s hard to read the S&P analysis as anything other than a blast at repugicans. In denouncing the threat of default as a “bargaining chip,” the agency was saying that the repugican strategy had shaken its confidence. Though S&P didn’t mention it, the agency must have been unnerved by the number of repugicans who insisted that it would be fine to blow through the debt ceiling and provoke a default.
ABC via Yahoo:
Would they follow the law on the books or the one in the works? What would federal courts tell them to do? Looking at the strange and destructive insanity of the repugican cabal, let’s take a guess how a repugican Congress might react.
No comments:
Post a Comment