Von Spakovsky offered me the names of two experts who, he said, would confirm that voter-impersonation fraud posed a significant peril: Robert Pastor, the director of the Center for Democracy and Election Management, at American University, and Larry Sabato, a political-science professor at the University of Virginia. Pastor, von Spakovsky noted, had spoken to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights about being a victim of election fraud: voting in Georgia, he discovered that someone else had already voted under his name.The Voter-Fraud Myth
When I reached Pastor, he clarified what had happened to him. “I think they just mistakenly checked my name when my son voted—it was just a mistake.” He added, “I don’t think that voter-impersonation fraud is a serious problem.” Pastor believes that, compared with other democracies, America is “somewhere near the bottom in election administration,” and thinks that voter I.D.s make sense—but only if they are free and easily available to all, which, he points out, is not what repugican legislatures have proposed. Sabato, who supports the use of voter I.D.s under the same basic conditions, says of the voter-impersonation question, “One fraudulent vote is one too many, but my sense is that it’s relatively rare today.”
Hasen says that, while researching “The Voting Wars,” he “tried to find a single case” since 1980 when “an election outcome could plausibly have turned on voter-impersonation fraud.” He couldn’t find one. News21, an investigative-journalism group, has reported that voter impersonation at the polls is a “virtually non-existent” problem. After conducting an exhaustive analysis of election-crime prosecutions since 2000, it identified only seven convictions for impersonation fraud. None of those cases involved conspiracy.
Welcome to ...
The place where the world comes together in honesty and mirth.
Windmills Tilted, Scared Cows Butchered, Lies Skewered on the Lance of Reality ... or something to that effect.
Windmills Tilted, Scared Cows Butchered, Lies Skewered on the Lance of Reality ... or something to that effect.
Tuesday, October 23, 2012
Voter fraud is a fraud
The New Yorker's "Voter-Fraud Myth" by Jane Mayer is a good,
fair, investigative piece tracking the rise of the repugican orthodoxy
that says that voter fraud is rampant, and that it favors Democrats.
Mayer makes a reasoned, factual case to show that there is no
substantial voter fraud problem (much-vaunted incidents like the scores
of dead voters in Georgia were later revealed to not have a single
verifiable instance of a dead person voting). Mayer also shows how
anti-fraud measures disproportionately target young people, poor people,
and visible minorities. This is a great piece to refer to when
discussing the subject with friends who've been convinced that voter ID
laws amount to anything other than partisan voter suppression.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment