Bassem Youssef's
case will increase worries about freedom of speech in the post-Hosni
Mubarak era, especially when the country's new constitution includes
provisions criticized by rights activists for, among other things,
forbidding insults.
In a separate case that fuels concern about press freedom, one of Egypt's
leading independent newspapers said it was being investigated by the
prosecutor following a complaint from the presidency, which accused it
of publishing false news.
Youssef rose to
fame following the uprising that swept Mubarak from power in February
2011 with a satirical online programme that was compared with Jon Stewart's Daily Show.
He has since had his own show on Egyptian television
and mocked Mursi's repeated use of the word "love" in his speeches by
starting one of his programmes with a love song, holding a red pillow
with the president's face printed on it.
The prosecutor
general ordered an investigation into a formal complaint against Youssef
by an Islamist lawyer. The complaint accuses him of "insulting" Mursi,
an Islamist backed by the Muslim Brotherhood, and "undermining his
standing".
Human rights activists say it is the latest in a series of criminal defamation cases that bode ill for free speech as Egypt reshapes its institutions after Mubarak was toppled.
"The greatest
threat to freedom of expression over the last four months has been this
rise in criminal defamation cases, whether it is on charges of defaming
the president or the judiciary," said Heba Morayef, Egypt director of
the New York-based Human Rights Watch.
"The problem is now
is we are likely to see an increase in this because criminal defamation
is now embedded in the constitution."
Rivals accuse
Mursi, who won Egypt's first freely contested leadership election in
June, of polarizing society by foisting a divisive, Islamist-leaning constitution on the country.
In the case against
the independent daily al-Masry al-Youm, the presidency accused the
paper of "spreading false news representing a danger to civil peace,
public security and affecting the presidency", the paper said.
The article in
question was a report on Saturday on the paper's website which cited
"informed sources" saying Mursi was due to visit hospital, without
giving a reason for the trip, al-Masry al-Youm said in an online account
of the case against it.
The presidency
denied Mursi was due to visit hospital. The paper said it had updated
its initial story to say the president's visit had been cancelled and
instead his wife had gone to the hospital to visit a family member.
Al-Masry Al-Youm said one of its editors had been summoned by the prosecutor for questioning next Saturday.
No comments:
Post a Comment