The Vikings did not only go West to pillage and plunder. Most of the
silk found in the Oseberg ship may have been purchased by honest means
from Persia.
The Norwegian Vikings maintained trade connections with Persia and the
Byzantine Empire. A network of traders from a variety of places and
cultures brought the silk to the Nordic countries. Her details are
presented in the book “Silk for the Vikings”, to be published by Oxbow
publishers this winter, but in this article you can glimpse some of her
key findings.
In the Oseberg ship, which was excavated nearly a hundred years ago,
more than one hundred small silk fragments were found. This is the
oldest find of Viking Age silk in Norway.
At the time when the Oseberg silk was discovered, nobody conceived that
it could have been imported from Persia. It was generally believed that
most of it had been looted from churches and monasteries in England and
Ireland.
Lots of Viking silk
Since the Oseberg excavation, silk from the Viking Age has been found in
several locations in the Nordic countries. The last finding was made
two years ago at Ness in Hamaroy municipality, Nordland county. Other
Norwegian findings of silk from the Viking Age include Gokstad in
Vestfold county, Sandanger in the Sunnmore district and Nedre Haugen in
Ostfold county.
The highest number of burial sites containing silk from the Viking Age
have been found at Birka in the Uppland region, a few miles west of
Stockholm.
– Even though Birka has the highest number of burial sites containing
silk, there are no other places where so much and such varied silk has
been found in a single burial site as in Oseberg, says Marianne Vedeler
to the research magazine Apollon.
In Oseberg alone, silk from fifteen different textiles, as well as
embroideries and tablet-woven silk and wool bands were discovered. Many
of the silk pieces had been cut into thin strips and used for articles
of clothing. The textiles had been imported, while the tablet-woven
bands most likely were made locally from imported silk thread.
Marianne Vedeler has collected information on silk and its trade in the
Nordic countries. She has also studied manuscripts on silk production
and trade along the Russian rivers as well as in Byzantium and Persia.
– When seeing it all in its totality, it’s more logical to assume that
most of the silk was purchased in the East, rather than being looted
from the British Isles.
Waterways
Vedeler believes that in the Viking Age, silk was imported from two main
areas. One was Byzantium, meaning in and around Constantinople, or
Miklagard, which was the Vikings’ name for present-day Istanbul. The
other large core area was Persia.
The silk may have been brought northwards along different routes.
– One possibility is from the South through Central Europe and onwards
to Norway, but I believe that most of the silk came by way of the
Russian rivers Dnepr and Volga.
The Dnepr was the main route to Constantinople, while the Volga leads to
the Caspian Sea. The river trade routes were extremely dangerous and
difficult. One of the sources describes the laborious journey along the
Dnepr to Constantinople.
– A band of traders joined up in Kiev. Along the river they were
attacked by dangerous tribesmen. They needed to pass through rapids and
cataracts. Then, slaves had to carry their boat.
Persian patterns
On the basis of the silk that has been found, there are indications that
more silk came to Norway from Persia than from Constantinople.
– Large amounts of the Oseberg silk have patterns from the Persian
Empire. This silk is woven using a technique called samitum, a
sophisticated Oriental weaving method. Many of the silk motifs can be
linked to religious motifs from Central Asia.
Another pattern depicts a shahrokh, a bird that has a very specific
meaning in Persian mythology; it represents a royal blessing. In the
Persian myth, the shahrokh bird is the messenger that brings the
blessing to a selected prince. In a dream, the bird visits the prince
holding a tiara, a tall head adornment, in its beak. The prince then
wakes up and knows that he is the chosen one. The image of the imperial
bird was popular not only in silk weaving, but also in other art forms
in Persia. The motif gained widespread popularity in Persian art.
– It’s an amusing paradox that silk textiles with such religious and
mythological images were highly prized and used in heathen burial sites
in the Nordic countries as well as in European churches.
Exclusive
In the Orient, silk was essential for symbolizing power and strength.
There was an entire hierarchy of different silk qualities and patterns
reserved for civil servants and royalty.
Even though silk was a prominent status symbol for the Vikings, they failed to get their hands on the best silk.
– Most likely, the bulk of the silk imported to Scandinavia was of medium or below-medium quality.
In Byzantium, major restrictions were imposed on the sale of silk to
foreign lands. The punishment for illegal sale of silk was draconian.
The Persian lands also imposed strict restrictions on the sale and
production of silk.
In Byzantium, it was illegal to buy more silk than what could be bought
for the price of a horse. A foreign trader was allowed to buy silk for
ten numismata, while the price of a horse was twelve numismata.
– However, several trade agreements that have been preserved show that
traders from the North nevertheless had special trade privileges in
Byzantium.
Silk was not only a trade commodity. Certain types of silk were reserved
for diplomatic gifts to foreign countries, as described in Byzantine as
well as Persian sources. In Europe, silk became especially popular for
wrapping sacred relics in churches.
– Some of the silk found in Norway may be gifts or spoils of war, but
archaeological as well as written sources indicate that silk was traded
in the Nordic countries.
– So the Vikings were more honest than has been assumed?
– We may safely assume that the Vikings engaged in trade, plunder, exchange of gifts and diplomatic relations in equal measure.
A possible example of loot found in the Oseberg ship is a piece of silk with an image of a cross.
– This was long before the introduction of Christianity. The silk piece
may have been sewn locally, but it is also highly likely that it was
purloined from an Irish church.
Possibly China
At Gokstad, thin strips of hammered gold wrapped around silk threads were among the findings.
– These threads are highly exclusive. We do not know their origin, but
we suspect that they may have come from even further east, in the
direction of China, says Vedeler, who will now travel to China to find
out more.
As yet, Vedeler must draw conclusions regarding the origin of the silk
by investigating weaving technologies and patterns. With time, she
wishes to make use of a new method which is being developed at the
University of Copenhagen and which will be able to reveal the geographic
origin of artifacts.
No comments:
Post a Comment