An Indiana University
archaeo-informaticist has used virtual simulations to flip the calendar
back thousands of years and show for the first time the historical
significance of the unique alignment of the sun with two monuments tied
to the founder of the Roman Empire.
Virtual archaeology uncovers secrets of ancient Rome
Virtual simulation image of the sun atop the obelisk with the Altar of
Peace in the foreground [Credit : Indiana University]
For nearly a half-century, scholars had associated the relationship
between the Ara Pacis, the “Altar of Peace” dedicated in 9 BC to
then-emperor Augustus, and the Obelisk of Montecitorio -- a 71-foot-high
granite obelisk Augustus brought to Rome from Egypt -- with Augustus’
Sept. 23 birthday.
Prevailing research had found that on this day, the shadow of the
obelisk -- serving as the pointer, or gnomon, of a giant sundial on the
plaza floor -- would point toward the middle of the Ara Pacis, which the
Roman Senate had commissioned to recognize the peace brought to the
Roman Empire through Augustus' military victories.
Over his nearly 40 years of teaching Roman topography classes, IU
Bloomington School of Informatics and Computing professor Bernie
Frischer had always informed students of that prevailing theory, but
today in an announcement made at the Vatican’s Pontifical Archaeological
Academy in Rome, Frischer provided another explanation for the original
placement of the two landmarks that were both parallel and adjacent to
what was at the time the major road, the Via Flaminia, leading from Rome
over the Apennine Mountains to the coast of the Adriatic Sea.
“What's important is not the shadow of the obelisk, but the sun's disk
seen over the center of the top of the obelisk from a position on the
Via Flaminia in front of the Ara Pacis,” Frischer said. New computer
simulations now show that German scholar Edmund Buchner's longstanding
theory that the shadow of the obelisk hit the center of the facade of
the Ara Pacis was wrong.
Virtual archaeology uncovers secrets of ancient Rome
Virtual view of Augustus' Altar of Peace and the Obelisk of
Montecitorio, background,
as seen from the Via Flaminia, the ancient road from Rome
to the Adriatic Sea [Credit : Indiana University]
GPS coordinates, known dimensions and additional bibliographical sources
were also used to create the 3-D models of the Ara Pacis, the meridian
and the obelisk, all of which would have been located at the 490-acre
site then known as the Campus Martius. Frischer said his Rome-based
research assistant Ismini Miliaresis conducted critical research on the
meridian line location, and independent scholar and professional
meridian designer and engineer Paolo Albèri Auber conducted the refined
work on the obelisk’s original size.
Using NASA's Horizons System, which gives the position of objects in the
solar system in the sky at any time in history as seen from any spot on
earth, along with surveys of the location of the sundial’s original
meridian line, and the height of the obelisk in exacting detail,
Frischer and a team that included John Fillwalk, director of the
Institute for Digital Intermedia Arts at Ball State University,
determined the sun’s placement at the top of the obelisk occurred on
Oct. 9.
“Inscriptions on the obelisk show that Augustus explicitly dedicated the
obelisk to his favorite deity, Apollo, the Sun god,” Frischer said.
“And the most lavish new temple Augustus built, the Temple of Palatine
Apollo, was dedicated to his patron god and built right next to
Augustus’ own home.
“So the new date of the alignment, Oct. 9, is actually what we know to
be the annual birthday festival of the Temple of Palatine Apollo,” he
said. “No other date on the Roman religious calendar would have been as
appropriate as this.”
While Fillwalk and the IDIA Lab at Ball State created one interactive
model that runs in the game engine Unity, IU School of Informatics
research scientist Matthew Brennan used AutoCad and 3-D Studio Max to
create a photorealistic model the team used to generate images and video
clips illustrative of the research. Frischer then sought independent
confirmation of the findings from Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
astrophysicist David Dearborn.
“He ran independent tests of our solar alignments, using different
software and methods, and his conclusions confirmed what we had found,
giving us added confidence that our discovery is correct,” Frischer
said.
The work is a statement to the possibilities inherent in using
information technology to support the work of archaeologists, and
specifically for Frischer, the use of 3-D modeling.
“Empiricism, that sense of direct observation of nature through the
senses, in some cases has had to give way to thought experiments and
likewise, to computer simulations, as objects of study recede beyond our
innate sensory apparatus in time, space and scale,” he said. “I call it
‘simpiricism,’ where we create computer simulations to bring our object
back within the ken of the natural senses so it can be observed again,
in a way analogous to what was done in the time of classic empiricism.”
“3-D modeling can show scholars and, indeed, the general public, what
the archaeologist uncovered, and it can be used to provide a view of how
the site or object looked when it was new and in subsequent stages of
its use and destruction,” Frischer said.
No comments:
Post a Comment