And
this, too: If God wanted you to be healthy, wealthy and wise, he
would have given you better parents. It's a practice near to sin to
get the taxpayers to take care of you and yours. The taxpayers have a
hard enough time taking care of the rich.
The
rich have earned our blind, gushing loyalty (How, you ask? By being
rich, you ninny).
[...]
PovertyChild
coal mine workers, 1900s
I
bring this up because Nate Silver says there's a 60% chance the repugicans will take the senate. Nate seems to know what he's
talking about but he doesn't say why the repugicans deserve to take
the Senate. That's for the rest of us to chew over. So I'm chewing:
How many workers see something in the repugicans that tells them life will be better when the repugican cabal/tea party takes over Congress? What is it they see?How many women see something in the repugican cabal that the rest of us don't? Enough to take them over the top? What is it they see?When the repugicans win will they finally get busy and deliver on sustainable jobs? Affordable, ethical health care? Bridges? Roads? Pollution? Kids? Or will a comfortable win tell them all they need to know about the sterling virtues of capitalism and the ready acceptance of an oligarchy?
Paul
Krugman:
America's nascent oligarchy may not yet be fully formed - but one of our two main political parties already seems committed to defending the oligarchy's interests.
Despite
the frantic efforts of some repugicans to pretend otherwise, most
people realize that today's repugican cabal favors the interests of the rich
over those of ordinary families. I suspect, however, that fewer
people realize the extent to which the cabal favors returns on wealth
over wages and salaries. And the dominance of income from capital,
which can be inherited, over wages - the dominance of wealth over
work - is what patrimonial capitalism is all about.
.
In
Bernie Sanders' report, "Poverty is a Death Sentence", he
warns:
"If people don't have access to health care, if they don't have access to education, if they don't have access to jobs and affordable housing then we end up paying not only in terms of human suffering and the shortening of life expectancy but in actual dollars."
These
are not revelations new to the 21st century. Krugman and Sanders are
both echoing what President Roosevelt said in his 1944 State of the
Union speech, in the midst of the Second World War, when he proposed
a second Bill of Rights:
We have come to a clear realization of the fact that true individual freedom cannot exist without economic security and independence. "Necessitous men are not free men." People who are hungry and out of a job are the stuff of which dictatorships are made.In our day these economic truths have become accepted as self-evident. We have accepted, so to speak, a second Bill of Rights under which a new basis of security and prosperity can be established for all regardless of station, race, or creed.Among these are:The right to a useful and remunerative job in the industries or shops or farms or mines of the Nation;The right to earn enough to provide adequate food and clothing and recreation;The right of every farmer to raise and sell his products at a return which will give him and his family a decent living;The right of every businessman, large and small, to trade in an atmosphere of freedom from unfair competition and domination by monopolies at home or abroad;The right of every family to a decent home;The right to adequate medical care and the opportunity to achieve and enjoy good health;The right to adequate protection from the economic fears of old age, sickness, accident, and unemployment;The right to a good education.
No comments:
Post a Comment