Just days before its international debut at an airshow in the United
Kingdom, the entire fleet of the Pentagon’s next generation fighter
plane — known as the F-35 II Lightning, or the Joint Strike Fighter — has been grounded,
highlighting just what a boondoggle the project has been. With the vast
amounts spent so far on the aircraft, the United States could have
worked wonders, including providing every homeless person in the U.S. a
$600,000 home.
It’s hard to argue against the need to modernize aircraft used to
defend the country and counter enemies overseas, especially if you’re a
politician. But the Joint Strike Fighter program has been a mess almost
since its inception, with massive cost overruns leading to its current acquisition price-tag of $398.6 billion — an increase
of $7.4 billion since last year. That breaks down to costing about $49
billion per year since work began in 2006 and the project is seven years
behind schedule. Over its life-cycle, estimated at about 55 years,
operating and maintaining the F-35 fleet will cost the U.S. a little
over $1 trillion. By contrast, the entirety of the Manhattan Project —
which created the nuclear bomb from scratch — cost about $55 billion in today’s dollars.
“The political armor of the F-35 is as thick as the heads of the
people who designed the airplane and its acquisition plan,” Winslow
Wheeler, a former congressional staffer and outspoken critic of the
F-35, recently told Foreign Policy
about the longevity of the plane, despite the many setbacks it has
endured. The support for the F-35 is so great in Congress that there’s
actual a bipartisan Joint Strike Fighter Caucus
dedicated to promoting it and keeping it alive.
No comments:
Post a Comment