One of the ironies of court wars over vote
suppression laws lies in the fact that proponents of suppressing the
vote argue they want to preserve the “status quo” in the name of
preventing confusion among voters.
Actually, since repugicans are waging an
increasingly aggressive war on voting rights, their desired status quo
is confusion, much like the status quo of confusion in 2012.
That is obvious with the last minute efforts to find
vote suppression sympathizers in the courts, to uphold laws
specifically intended to suppress the vote.
The bottom line is repugicans have a two-pronged
approach to stealing the election in 2014 – suppress and confuse. Aside
from repugicans working the legal system, they have help from the Koch
Brothers to stir the waves of confusion by sending out false
information about registering, voting day and voting requirements. When
they were caught, Americans for Prosperity said oops. The latest claim
is they “accidentally”
sent Arkansas voter information to voters in North Carolina. Of course
we believe them when they say the objective was to “prevent” confusion
and keep the election process “honest.”
If repugicans were so concerned about preventing
confusion, they wouldn’t continue to fight court rulings that overturn
their unconstitutional vote suppression laws.
The bottom line is repugicans have two objectives
this season. Suppress as many votes as possible and when that fails,
create as much confusion as possible.
In some cases, at least the legal battles are over
for the purpose of this election because the court battles have reach
the Supreme Court.
Voters in Wisconsin will be voting under the same rules that applied in 2012.
Voters in North Carolina will be restricted to voting under the conditions set out in the State’s vote suppression law.
Currently, Texas voters are subject to the restrictions set out in that state’s vote suppression law. However, this could change since the U.S. Supreme Court is considering whether to uphold or stay a recent ruling that Greg Abbott called a “victory.”
Since the State Supreme Court in Arkansas
struck down that state’s vote suppression law, that decision is likely
to hold. The court noted that the state’s constitution identifies
specific requirements to vote. The person must be a citizen of the U.S.
and Arkansas. They must be 18 years old and be lawfully registered.
The court said,
These four qualifications set forth in our state’s constitution simply do not include any proof-of-identity requirement,
Unless repugicans take this to Federal Court, the
state’s previous law will apply during this year’s election. That means
election workers are required to ask for photo ID, but voters do not
need to produce it in order to cast a ballot.
In Georgia, the confusion is surrounding the
registration status of tens of thousands of voters. Last week, the
national Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights and New Georgia Project
filed a suit
against Georgia’s Secretary of State, Brian Kemp, and five counties.
The NLCCR asked a judge to make sure over 40,000 people will be able to
vote in this election.
On Thursday, Kemp said 40,000
over the voters are “active” and on the rolls. Another 10,000 voters
are “pending”. Just the same, considering the source, Georgia voters
should independently verify that they are, in fact, registered to vote
in this election.
The best way to protect your vote is to cut through
the confusion by going to a reliable source. Chances are better of
getting accurate information when the source of it doesn’t have an
ideological disposition to suppressing your vote. The Election Assistance Commission
website is a good one to look at. It provides registration and voting
requirements. It has a FAQ section and provides translated information.
Whatever you do, don’t let the repugican tactic of suppress and confuse steal your voice.
No comments:
Post a Comment