Wendy Davis with help from groups that support her is leading the way in the people’s fight against vote suppression.
While Greg Abbott dedicates his efforts to
disenfranchises hundreds of thousands of eligible voters in Texas, Wendy
Davis is encouraging voters to exercise their franchise and Davis’
efforts are paying off.
Monday was the first day of early voting in Texas and according to figures
released by the Secretary of State, voter turnout in the six largest
counties were higher than the first day of early voting in 2010.
This is a direct result of the hard work and dedication by groups who support Wendy Davis. Led by Battleground Texas voter registration groups rolled up their sleeves and got to work registering millions of voters, many
of whom are minorities. While Greg Abbott decided it better served his
interests to disenfranchise these voters, Texans with the help of voter
registration groups had a different idea.
So far, there have been no reports of problems at the polls.
No doubt, supporters of vote suppression laws will
argue this proves that the laws in question do not and never were
intended to suppress the vote. The fact is, people will be
disenfranchised be it under the strictest voter ID law in the United
States for reasons I and others have stated on numerous occasions.
While some states may offer “free voter ID” the costs involved in
getting the documents needed to get that “free ID” still amount to an
unaffordable poll tax. Often repugicans will say the ID is “free” for
people who can’t afford it, but fail to mention the costs that go with
getting the ID needed to get the “free voter ID.” Aside from the costs
of those documents, it means taking time off work. That means aside
from the costs, voters are hit with the additional financial penalty of
losing income.
The fact is, repugicans know it and some, are
saying it. Chris Christie said categorically that repugicans have to
win gubernatorial elections so that they can control “voting mechanisms.”
Would you rather have Rick Scott in Florida overseeing the voting mechanism, or Charlie Crist? Would you rather have Scott Walker in Wisconsin overseeing the voting mechanism, or would you rather have Mary Burke? Who would you rather have in Ohio, John Kasich or Ed FitzGerald?
Rick Scott, Scott Walker and John Kasich have all
been before the courts defending “laws” that amount to perpetrating a
fraud on the public under the pretense that they care about stopping
election fraud.
The repugicans like to muddy the waters by suggesting
that being a Republic and having honest, fair and open elections are
mutually exclusive. The truth is that repugicans they are willing to
throw free and fair elections under the bus because they can’t win by
honest means.
It’s up to us to send repugicans a loud and clear
message that rigging elections has consequences. Stealing people’s
votes will not be tolerated.
The groups led by Battleground Texas are showing us how it’s done.
No comments:
Post a Comment