"Their worldview makes it nearly impossible for them to react with compassion instead of fear..."
by Amanda Marcotte
Objectively, the disease is a nonpartisan issue. That hasn't stopped Faux News from blaming its spread on Obama
Of all the
issues that you would think would be non-partisan, Ebola should be at
the top of the list. The disease is just a mindless germ that doesn't
check your race, gender, social class, sexual orientation or party
identification before it strikes, suggesting both liberals and
conservatives have a stake in treating people exposed to the disease
with compassion and care. And yet, to flip on Faux News or turn on any wingnut media at all, you'd think that Ebola was some kind of
plague designed by the Democratic party in order to wipe out repugicans.Blowing the threat of Ebola out of proportion and trying to link it to Obama has been a constant theme of the wingnuts in recent days. Elisabeth Hasselbeck of Faux News literally demanded that we put the country on lock-down, banning all travel in and out. In a bit of race-baiting, Andrea Tantaros of Faux suggested that people who travel to the country and show symptoms of Ebola will "seek treatment from a witch doctor" instead of go to the hospital. Faux hack Steve Doocy suggested the CDC is lying about Ebola because they're "part of the administration". Faux also promoted a conspiracy theorist who is trying to claim the CDC is lying when they caution people not to panic.
Other wingnut media joined in. Tammy Bruce blamed Ebola on the "Obama legacy". Laura Ingraham said Obama was prevented from doing more to stop the disease because of his "core ties to the African continent". Lush Dimbulb even went as far as to accuse Obama of letting the disease spread because he supposes liberals believe "we kind of deserve a little bit of this".
Even politicians are getting in on the act. Former South Carolina repugican cabal executive director Todd Kincannon tweeted, "The protocol for a positive Ebola test should be immediate humane execution and sanitzation of the whole area." The repugican presidential hopefuls stopped short of wishing death on people who have the disease, but are nonetheless crawling all over each other to make a bigger deal out of ebola than it really is. Rand Paul, Ted Cruz, Paul Ryan and Bobby Jindal have all suggested that we ban travel in and out of the country, at least some travel, in order to keep a lid on Ebola.
None of this is even in the realm of reasonable, of course. There's only been one case of Ebola in the entire country (now 2 - a nurse who treated the 1 has contracted the disease) and the CDC has a well-practiced strategy for tracking and containing the disease. PBS science correspondent Miles O'Brien denounced the coverage as "irresponsible" and asked people to "take a deep breath" before fear-mongering about ebola.
With the threat being so small, why are conservatives going crazy like this? Part of it is pure political opportunism, trying to hitch their anti-Obama obsession to whatever scary news story is making headlines. Part of it is cynical fear-mongering for its own sake, as conservative pundits know that when people are afraid, the are more open to reactionary ideas. But a large part of it might be that wingnuts are just far more prone than liberals are both to getting wound up over the fear of disease and being compelled by the idea that people who are not themselves are undeserving of care.
No comments:
Post a Comment