Two long years and many fights later, the arrest warrant affidavit for David Gregory has finally been revealed.
Thanks to vigorous efforts by Legal Insurrection and Judicial Watch, we know now that police wanted to charge then Meet the Press host David Gregory with illegal possession of a high-capacity gun magazine after he brandished one on the air.
In an affidavit finally obtained via the Freedom of
Information Act by Judicial Watch for Legal Insurrection, it was
determined, “Based on the aforementioned facts and circumstances of this
investigation, your Affiant believes there is probable cause that the
offense of possessing a ‘high-capacity’ magazine was committed in the
District of Columbia. Therefore your Affiant requests the issuance of an
arrest warrant for Gregory, David Michael.”
The only thing that saved the host was Irvin Nathan,
the D.C. prosecutor, who declined to prosecute Gregory because he
claimed Gregory had no other criminal intent. (No, this won’t work for
you.)
William A. Jacobson at the “influential” conservative website of Legal Insurrection summed up the frustrating situation after years of fighting to obtain the documents:
This is likely the final chapter in the saga of our two-year long fight to obtain important documents regarding the non-prosecution of David Gregory for possessing on Meet the Press an illegal high-capacity ammunition magazine.The short version is that the D.C. Metropolitan Police Department warned NBC News that it could not possess an actual high-capacity magazine, but NBC News went ahead and did it anyway. The MPD recommended a warrant for Gregory’s arrest, but that request was nixed by the D.C. Attorney General Irvin Nathan because — my paraphrase — Gregory was just too nice a guy and had no other criminal intent.That attitude stood in stark contrast to the D.C. Attorney General’s vigorous prosecution of other lesser-known people who also were nice people and had no other criminal intent, but violated D.C.’s gun laws.
The folks at Legal Insurrection made the point that
they didn’t want Gregory arrested, but they feel that the law itself is
ridiculous and needs to be changed. They don’t believe it will be
changed until it’s applied to “high profile citizens.” If you are not
David Gregory, the consequences for this misdemeanor can include up to a
$1,000 fine and/or up to one year in in prison.
Gregory used the magazine during a December 23, 2012
interview with the head of the NRA, Wayne LaPierre, after the Newtown
shootings. The problem is, it ‘s illegal to possess a large capacity
magazine in D.C., even if it’s empty.
Two years ago, in January of 2013, the prosecutor’s
office “determined to exercise its prosecutorial discretion to decline
to bring criminal charges against Mr. Gregory, who has no criminal
record”. But it was unclear what went on behind the scenes, hence the
Freedom of Information Act requests by Legal Insurrection, whose
ultimate goal is to have the law abolished. Two years and many run
arounds later, we finally have the facts.
Don’t try this at home, because your “intent” might not be so clear to prosecutors.
As silly as it might seem to arrest a TV show host
for breaking the law on air when it seems harmless enough, the law
should be applied to everyone equally and in fact, it could be argued
that those in positions of power and influence like a TV host have a
greater responsibility to model legal behavior.
No matter what, ascribing intentions to people gets
into fallacious argument territory and kicks the door open to
inequitable application of the law between the haves and the have-nots.
No comments:
Post a Comment