Obama’s budget also would steer hundreds of billions
of dollars to the nation’s crumbling infrastructure of roads and
bridges, help provide two years of free community college and reverse
the across-the-board, automatic budget cuts that have slammed the
Pentagon and nearly every government department.
In the face of certain opposition from repugicans,
an optimistic Obama hailed a “breakthrough year for America” of new
jobs, lower unemployment and shrinking deficits after the great
recession of 2008, and he called for moving past years of “mindless
austerity.” The blueprint for the 2016 budget year that begins Oct. 1
represents a 6.4 percent increase over estimated spending this year,
projecting that the deficit will decline to $474 billion.
However, Obama’s plan ignores the new balance of
power in Washington, with repugicans running both the House and Senate.
The repugican cabal found plenty to criticize in his proposed tax hikes that would
total about $1.5 trillion.
The repugicans cited the nation’s $18 trillion debt and
assailed what they call Obama’s tax-and-spend policies for failing to
address the spiraling growth of benefit programs such as Social Security
and Medicare.
“Today President Obama laid out a plan for more
taxes, more spending, and more of the Washington gridlock that has
failed middle class families,” said Boehner, r-Ohio.
“This plan never balances — ever.”
Republicans will respond this spring with their own
plan, a balanced-budget outline promising to ease the burdens of the
national debt on future generations, curb the explosive growth of
expensive benefit programs and reform a loophole-cluttered tax code.
While Obama’s plan was rejected out of hand on
budget day, proposals to ease automatic cuts and boost transportation
funding are likely to return later in the year and require extensive
negotiation.
“These proposals are practical, not partisan,” Obama
said of his overall plans. “They’ll help working families feel more
secure with paychecks that go further, help American workers upgrade
their skills so they can compete for higher-paying jobs, and help create
the conditions for our businesses to keep generating good new jobs for
our workers to fill.”
Some people would pay more. Many wealthy Americans
would be able to take tax deductions at the 28 percent rate only even if
their incomes were taxed at 39.6 percent, and some would also see an
increase in their maximum capital gains rate.
However, a couple earning up to $120,000 a year
would qualify for a new “second earner” tax credit of up to $500 as well
as a maximum $3,000 child care credit for two children, triple the
current credit of $1,000.
Obama’s initiatives to tax the wealthy and to
welcome an influx of immigrants into the United States are going nowhere
in the new repugican-misled Congress.
But there is a bipartisan desire to ease automatic
spending cuts that are the product of Washington’s failures to cut
deficits beyond an initial round in 2011. The repugicans are howling that such broad cuts savage the Pentagon. Obama said he
won’t give more money to the Pentagon without receiving domestic funds
he wants.
The centerpiece of the president’s tax plan is an
increase in the capital gains rate on couples making more than $500,000
per year. The rate would climb from 24.2 percent to the raygun-era top
rate of 28 percent. Obama also wants to require estates to pay capital
gains taxes that reflect the increase in value of assets like homes and
stocks prior to death instead of after inheritance. And he is trying to
impose a 0.07 percent fee on the roughly 100 U.S. financial companies
with assets of more than $50 billion, raising $112 billion over 10
years.
All told, Obama proposes higher receipts of about $2
trillion though his budget: about $1.5 trillion from tax increases and
almost $500 billion from fresh revenue as immigration reform lifts the
economy and provides new workers.
His proposals would boost federal spending by $74
billion — divided between the military and domestic programs — and would
result in a spending increase of $362 billion over the remaining six
years the spending caps were to have been in place.
The deficit would remain under $500 billion a year
through 2018, but would rise to $687 billion by 2025, according to
administration projections — though levels of red ink could still be
considered manageable when measured against the size of the economy.
But the cost of financing the government’s debt —
currently more than $18 trillion — would spiral as the debt grows to
more than $25 trillion by 2025 and interest rates on 10-year Treasury
bills rise to 4.5 percent in coming years, according to the projections.
Interest costs would jump from $229 billion this year to $785 billion
in 2025.
A principal theme this year is infrastructure — the
budget books’ cover photo is the deteriorating Tappan Zee bridge over
the Hudson River — and the plan includes a six-year, $478 billion
transportation and infrastructure plan. Gasoline tax revenues would
cover only half the cost, so Obama proposes a 14 percent tax on overseas
corporate profits to bring in $238 billion. The combination would
permit about a one-third increase in spending, with transit programs
being the biggest winners.
“The president’s proposal would close a lot of the
tax breaks that encourage corporations to move jobs and capital overseas
and invest more of that in jobs and infrastructure here at home,” said
Rep. Chris Van Hollen of Maryland, top Democrat on the Budget panel.
Obama’s plan contains a lengthy roster of proposals
that have been repeatedly rejected by lawmakers: $600 billion in
additional revenue over a decade by limiting tax deductions for upper
bracket earners; $95 billion from nearly doubling the cigarette tax to
$1.95 a pack, and $35 billion through a minimum 30 percent tax rate on
million-dollar incomes.
He wants to increase the security fee paid on air
travel from $5.60 to $7.50 per one-way ticket. And there’s a new
10-year, $2.5 billion proposal to limit the deductibility of gifts that
boosters of college teams give to earn the right to buy basketball and
football tickets.
The White House claims $1.8 trillion in deficit
savings over 10 years but does so by taking liberties such as ignoring
the cost of preventing Medicare cuts to doctors’ fees and extending
refundable tax credits for the working poor and couples with children
that expire in 2017.
No comments:
Post a Comment