Pet Central owner Linda Ashworth was shocked they were judged too
naughty by ECan.
"We have not spoken to any person who has taken offense at them," she
said.
ECan defended its decision not to allow the ads on the buses, saying it
had to think about their impact on children.
"Like everyone, we appreciate good humor. And of course we see the humor in these ads," ECan's public transport manager David
Stenhousesaid.
"Individual bus companies usually make the decision on advertisements
through their media agency. However, they come to us for a second
opinion if they are unsure whether it is appropriate for the audience.
"In this case, these ads are not appropriate for bus backs because of their sexual and drug implications. Our buses are publicly funded, and we believe we have a responsibility to the huge number of children who are exposed to bus advertising when they take or follow the buses," Stenhouse said. "We have not been approached by Pet Central over these advertisements. Our contact was with the bus company and advertising agency," he said. Ashworth admitted the company had deliberately set out to push the boundaries with its advertising but did not believe it had over-stepped the mark. "We are a small company and we are trying to get an edge in the Christchurch market.
"We don't have a lot of money. It's just me. We wanted to have a bit of fun. We wanted people to see the ads and go wow, that's cool what are they going to come with next," Ashworth said. She had tried to get a meeting with ECan to discuss what they found offensive so she could make changes to the adverts, but had been refused. "I think whoever it is who made the decision thinks me and my creative lady are two young girls who are a highly sexed and smoke a lot of dope. If they saw us they would get quite a shock because we are in our 50s and prim and proper," Ashworth said. "We've come to an absolute block wall so we've had to put them on billboards which is not what we wanted to do. We wanted them on the back of the buses."
"In this case, these ads are not appropriate for bus backs because of their sexual and drug implications. Our buses are publicly funded, and we believe we have a responsibility to the huge number of children who are exposed to bus advertising when they take or follow the buses," Stenhouse said. "We have not been approached by Pet Central over these advertisements. Our contact was with the bus company and advertising agency," he said. Ashworth admitted the company had deliberately set out to push the boundaries with its advertising but did not believe it had over-stepped the mark. "We are a small company and we are trying to get an edge in the Christchurch market.
"We don't have a lot of money. It's just me. We wanted to have a bit of fun. We wanted people to see the ads and go wow, that's cool what are they going to come with next," Ashworth said. She had tried to get a meeting with ECan to discuss what they found offensive so she could make changes to the adverts, but had been refused. "I think whoever it is who made the decision thinks me and my creative lady are two young girls who are a highly sexed and smoke a lot of dope. If they saw us they would get quite a shock because we are in our 50s and prim and proper," Ashworth said. "We've come to an absolute block wall so we've had to put them on billboards which is not what we wanted to do. We wanted them on the back of the buses."
No comments:
Post a Comment