Once
upon a time, the side of a building was as good an advertising medium
as any, and many were painted to alert passers-by to the business
inside, or for some totally unrelated product. Now they are part of
history, sometimes faded and barely readable, sometimes only existing in
photographs. Seeing one provokes a sense of whimsy and nostalgia.
Should these 'ghost signs' be preserved? Even if you think they should
be, the greater question is "How?"
Some cities and
towns are restoring ghost signs with fresh paint, but that can be a
contentious issue. Winslow says that in the sign painting community,
many people believe that for a restoration to be authentic, it must be
repainted by the person who originally painted the sign, or a direct
apprentice. That’s tough for a 75-year-old sign.
Color and paint
choice presents another problem. Ghost signs have lasted so long because
the paint contained lead. Modern paints peel, rather than slowly fading
away. Many of today’s restorations are painted in bright colors, but
old paints were less vibrant, and the available palette was limited.
Preservationists
see the question as the kind of trade-off they confront all the time.
Tod Swormstedt of the American Sign Museum said,
“It’s
kind of a subjective call, like when you restore an old house; are you
going to restore it back to not having electric lights and have gas
lights and not have a bathroom, not have indoor plumbing like some of
the early Victorian houses?” Swormstedt says. “How purist do you want to
get?”
But experiential designer
Craig Winslow has a totally different method for preserving ghost signs, one that doesn't affect the building at all. Read about his work at City Lab.
No comments:
Post a Comment