Lunatic Fringe

Lunatic Fringe

When dealing with wingnuts ... Remember the rule: 

If they accuse someone of something, then they're already guilty of it.

Liars and Fools

Faux's Glen Brick lies that anti-terror policies — including assassination — will soon be used against "tea party goers". 

Only from one of their own which would be a pity now wouldn't it.

Wingnut Andrew Breitbart's BigGovernment website lies: Obama "doesn't really want to plug the oil leak in the Gulf". 

That would be the Dick (as in Satan aka Cheney) - it is his fault in the first place and now that it is loose he's making even more money from it

Newt Gingrich (reptile-Georgia) lies: Obama "engaged" in "racist dialogue to try to frighten Latinos away from the Republican Party". 

Nope, there is no need ... you Bozos are doing a mighty fine job of that all by yourselves.

Lush Dimbulb lies: Democrats "don't mind" and "want" oil spill because it is "something they can use". 

Wrong, that'd be you morons and you are trying to use it and failing miserably - just as you always do.

Erick Erickson's baseless lies Obama "doesn't like the military". 

Nope that'd be the shrub and the cabal and their ilk who keep proving it over and over and over ...

In rant on "evil," "crypto-fascist" Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan, wingnut loudmouth Michael Savage lies: she would "stop certain speech and certain talk". 

Unfortunately she would not - even though she should

Faux's Glen Brick says he's "sick and tired of people believing the lie" that Obama "has respect for the soldiers". 

Remember kiddies, if a wingnut claims it is a lie, it is the truth ... Our president has a great deal of respect for our troops whereas the aforementioned wingnut(s) continually prove they do not.

Michael Savage lies: President Obama didn't have the "honor" or the "right" to speak to West Point cadets. 

Not only did he have the honor and the right to do so - he did, so tough. You on the other hand do not have any right much less honor to speak to or about our troops - we don't appreciate loud mouth fools.

Bryan Fischer, director of Issue Analysis for Government and Public Policy at the Un-American Anti-Family Association said:

So Hitler himself was an active homosexual. And some people wonder, didn’t the Germans, didn’t the Nazis, persecute homosexuals? And it is true they did; they persecuted effeminate homosexuals. But Hitler recruited around him homosexuals to make up his Stormtroopers, they were his enforcers, they were his thugs. And Hitler discovered that he could not get straight soldiers to be savage and brutal and vicious enough to carry out his orders, but that homosexual solders basically had no limits and the savagery and brutality they were willing to inflict on whomever Hitler sent them after. So he surrounded himself, virtually all of the Stormtroopers, the Brownshirts, were male homosexuals.

TPMMuckraker’s Zachary Roth writes:

There is very little hard evidence that Hitler himself was gay — though a bevy of historians has examined the question. The iota of truth behind Fischer’s view is that several leaders of the SA — the tightly organized band of street brawlers hat helped Hitler rise to power — were gay. That included Ernst Rohm, the unit’s founder and leader. But after Hitler began to doubt the SA’s loyalty, Rohm was arrested on the “Night of Long Knives” in 1934, and executed soon after. The SA subsequently took a backseat in the movement to Heinrich Himmler’s SS, whose allegiance to the Fuhrer was unquestioned.
And, if it needs pointing out, straight Nazis showed plenty of savagery and brutality

 Wingnut: Hitler Used Gay Soldiers Because They Had ‘No Limits’

File under: Examples of fascists of the present trying to paint fascists of the past as “liberals.”