Lying for the Lord (google it).
From the Washington Post's face checker:
In other words, this is an argument that Democrats have been
making for decades, one that repugicans have every right to reject.
Washington Post columnist Charles Krauthammer, for instance, understood
fully that Obama was talking about roads and still thought his logic was
faulty.
Romney, however, descends into silly season when he extrapolates Obama’s
quote and says that means Obama believes Steve Jobs did not build Apple
Computers.
Here’s what Obama said when Jobs passed away earlier this year: “By
building one of the planet’s most successful companies from his garage,
he exemplified the spirit of American ingenuity. By making computers
personal and putting the Internet in our pockets, he made the
information revolution not only accessible, but intuitive and fun.”
That sounds like Obama believes that Jobs really did build his company. He did not mention the roads to Cupertino.
The Pinocchio Test
Obama certainly could take from lessons from Warren or Roosevelt on how
to frame this argument in a way that is less susceptible for
quote-snipping. And Romney certainly could answer Obama’s argument by
engaging in a serious discussion about whether the wealthy should pay
much more in taxes as a matter of social good and equity. That would be
grounds for an elevated, interesting and important debate.
But instead, by focusing on one ill-phrased sentence, Romney and his
campaign have decided to pretend that Obama is talking about something
different — and then further extrapolated it so that it becomes
ridiculous. That’s not very original at all.
Three Pinocchios
No comments:
Post a Comment