The fact that not adhering to regulations kills workers never
seems to bother repugicans, or their business sector supporters which
is why they vehemently oppose regulations ...
In a perfect world where human beings adhered to the
mantra “do no harm,” there would likely be little need for rules and
regulations, but the world is not perfect and humans do need rules,
laws, and regulations. One of the overriding reasons humans need rules
and regulations is to protect them from people who could not care less
if their actions harmed others whether it is driving drunk, selling
poisoned food, or forcing workers to labor in unsafe conditions. The repugicans despise regulations on businesses they claim are trustworthy
and full of altruistic regard for the environment, consumers, and their
workers, and decry the cost of adhering to regulations kills businesses
and jobs. However, not adhering to regulations kills workers that never
seems to bother repugicans, or their business sector supporters which
is why they vehemently oppose regulations; especially those enforced by
the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA).
During the 2012 presidential campaign, a large
percentage of business owners complained that regulations under the
Obama Administration were too costly, killed jobs, and burdensome. That
was the complaint of a Wisconsin businessman, Lance Johnson, who said
President Obama’s workplace safety inspectors were encumbering him and
killing jobs with too much red tape. According to Johnson in a 2012 Wall
Street Journal campaign story, “I’ve never been audited by more government agencies in my life than I have under Obama.”
It is probably because President Obama is not the shrub and tasked
OSHA regulators with actually doing their job regardless the repugican
cuts to the agency.
Johnson is the president of Johnson Brass &
Machine Foundry Inc., and bemoaned what he called “aggressive” OSHA
regulators who subjected him to duplicative audits he claimed were
unnecessary and cost him “well in the six figures.” OSHA disputed Johnson’s “duplicative audits” claim, and according to their records had proposed penalties of $9,638 for exposing workers to “apparent hazards” in 2011 which is a far cry from “well in the six figures.”
OSHA is tasked with monitoring health and safety in
the workplace, and investigators will discover if the hazards they cited
Johnson’s company for were corrected because on Tuesday a “catastrophic failure”
of machinery injured eight workers and sent four to the hospital; two
had to be airlifted to a nearby burn unit. Fortunately none of the
workers’ injuries were life-threatening and according to Johnson the
eight workers were “only” sprayed with molten metal on their
legs and backs. Johnson did not respond to questions asking if he still
hated President Obama for imposing on him with aggressive OSHA
regulators he asserted were “too burdensome.”
After the horrifying industrial accident, Johnson
said in a statement that, “For more than one hundred years my family has
taken great pride in our safety record and our close relationship with
our employees. As the fourth president of this family-owned business, I
can say we are all deeply saddened by the accident at our plant.” The
Milwaukee-Wisconsin Journal Sentinel reported that the state fire marshal’s office assisted local police in “an ongoing investigation of the cause of the machinery failure;”
the investigators were joined by federal officials with the
Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Johnson was away at the
time or he could have gave the overly aggressive federal OSHA regulators
a piece of his mind about burdensome regulations, audits, and
complained about the “lost jobs” the penalties for “apparent hazards” at the foundry cost his business.
It is not the first time a business, or industry,
that complains bitterly about burdensome and costly safety regulations
is the scene of industrial accidents that more often than not kill
workers. The Deepwater Horizon (BP oil disaster) oil platform that
exploded killing 12 workers and poured 4.9 million barrels (210 million
gallons) of oil into the Gulf of Mexico was caused, in part, by the repugican-preferred ”self-regulating” nature of the oil
industry in 2010. Also in 2010, the Upper Big Branch Mine disaster
killed 29 out of 31 miners at the site of the worst mine disaster since
1970. A state-funded independent investigation found Massey Energy
directly responsible for the explosion and subsequent deaths due to “flagrant
safety violations.” One of the former Massey superintendents at the
mine confessed that he conspired to impede the safety enforcement
efforts of the federal Mine Safety and Health Administration at the
directions of the mine’s owners.
Last year in Texas, the West Fertilizer plant
explosion killed fifteen people, injured more than 160, and destroyed
over 150 buildings because it did not have adequate, and mandatory,
safeguards in place to store volatile anhydrous ammonia. The company had
been investigated and cited for not even having a permit for two
storage tanks in 2006, the same year the Environmental Protection Agency
fined the company’s owners for failure to file a risk management plan.
In 2012, the Department of Transportation further fined the company for
violations regarding its storage of the chemicals that blew up, killed
15 people, and leveled the town. The common denominator in all the
man-made disasters is, even with regulations in place to protect
workers, the companies’ owners found them too burdensome, too costly,
and they would claim “killed jobs” to bring the facilities into
compliance with health and safety regulations.
Earlier this year, after a West Virginia chemical
storage facility dumped toxic chemicals into the Dan River affecting
drinking water for 300,000 people, repugican John Boehner insisted that
the last thing the poor beleaguered “Freedom Industries” needed was
more regulations. Boehner even had the temerity to blame President Obama
for not enforcing regulations that repugicans refuse to enact under
any conditions. In fact, repugicans think so little of workplace safety
regulations they have dependably cut funding for OSHA because they just
cannot have “aggressive regulators” wading in to a private business and
inspecting, auditing, and penalizing businesses for apparent hazards to
workers or surrounding communities.
It is understandable that business is not enamored
with regulations, regulatory agencies, or in many cases their workers’
safety, especially when their sole regard is the bottom line. But their
workforce is why they have a bottom line in the first place and one
would expect that ensuring the health and safety of the people making
them millions would be every bit as important as profits, but apparently
that is not always the case. One hopes the workers who were sprayed
with molten metal have a speedy recovery, and that the company owner is
duly and severely punished if safety regulators, local police, and fire
marshals find he held his workers in the same contempt as he does OSHA
safety regulations. If history is any indication, he will likely shift
the blame to lax regulatory oversight or the Black guy in the White
House, or both.
No comments:
Post a Comment