The reaction from three repugicans on the Senate Armed
Services Committee to the President's announcement that America's
longest war was coming to an end was despicable and revealed…
Peacetime is generally defined as any period of time
where there are no violent conflicts occurring such as the time after
World War II when for Western Europe and America there was no war. For
most people, the idea of no war is a goal well worth achieving, and in
fact, the rare times America was able to extricate itself from war, or a
war came to an end, it was a time of relief, celebration, and using
wartime expenses for the good of the nation. The repugicans have a
different opinion about wars than most Americans, and if one believes
their rhetoric, they would keep America in a permanent state of war in
several geographical locations at once.
After twelve years and seven months, it seems as if
the unnecessary war in Afghanistan has gone on forever, and now that
President Obama has set a timetable to finally bring an end to that war, repugicans are apoplectic the country may see a desperately-needed
period of peacetime. The price of the Afghanistan war that poured
billions onto the nation’s deficit is over $720 billion and counting,
about $10.1 million an hour, 2,232 Americans killed, over 20,000 local
Afghani civilians killed, and tens-of-thousands of combat veterans
facing a lifetime of physical and psychological injuries that repugicans lust to increase.
The reaction from three repugicans on the Senate
Armed Services Committee to the President’s announcement that America’s
longest war was coming to an end was despicable and revealed that, in
their minds, there is never a time to end war. Senators John McCain,
Kelly Ayotte, and Lindsey Graham said in a statement that the President’s decision was “irresponsible
and a triumph of politics over strategy,” and a “a short-sighted
decision that will make it harder to end the war in Afghanistan
responsibly.” Stunningly, the three repugican warmongers repeated
the same rhetoric the shrub used to perpetuate the Iraq and
Afghanistan wars saying ending the war “will embolden our enemies
and discourage our partners, and fuel the growing perception worldwide
that America is unreliable, distracted, and unwilling to lead.”
The repugicans claimed that keeping combat forces in Afghanistan, presumably forever, would “preserve momentum on the battlefield and create conditions for a negotiated end to the conflict,” and that “any decision to end the war should be determined by conditions on the ground. The question is how the war ends.” The senators ended their end-of-war tantrum claiming that “wars
do not end just because politicians say so, the president appears to
have learned nothing from his disastrous decision to withdraw all U.S.
forces from Iraq. The war in Iraq has ended in tragedy.”
The warmongers are wrong on both counts; politicians do end wars just by saying “no more war,”
and the Iraq war ended successfully for Americans weary of violent
conflict halfway around the world. Period. It is worth noting, again and
again, that the so-called disastrous Iraqi sectarian violence going on
today began only after America invaded and destabilized the country and
has continued unabated. There was no sectarian violence, no Iranian
influence, and no al Qaeda presence in Iraq until the shrub set his
sights on regime change in Iraq. American forces leaving Iraq had about
as much to do with sectarian violence today as the civil war that
General David Patraeus and his failed surge allowed to give shia muslims
clearance to eradicate Sunnis from the embattled nation.
On CNN, wingnuts S.E. Cupp and Bill Kristol claimed that “what
is happening in Iraq will happen in Afghanistan. You know, we
successfully went in with a surge. We pulled our troops out too soon and
it has collapsed yet again into a den of terrorism. Why not commit to
the job and leave when the job is done?” However, one thing repugicans criticizing President Obama’s decision yesterday could not
elucidate now any more than during the entire Iraq or Afghanistan wars;
what job? What is the mission? If it is defeating an insurgency, history
shows time and time again that an invading army cannot defeat an
insurgency; particularly in a country like Afghanistan that has been
invaded, occupied, and conquered throughout its history only to revert
to its natural state of perpetual infighting and tribal wars.
The American people are war weary and the nation is,
and will continue to be, in debt for waging unfunded and unnecessary
wars of convenience over ideology, resources, and imperialism. It is
prescient that as Republicans claim this country can ill-afford to
rebuild and repair its pathetic infrastructure, fund unemployment
benefits, food stamps, or any other domestic programs, it can afford to
continue spending $10.1 million an hour to stay in Afghanistan until “conditions on the ground determine when the war ends.” As President Obama said, “we have to recognize Afghanistan will not be a perfect place, and it is not America’s responsibility to make it one.”
It is high time that repugicans recognize that their sole
responsibility is to do their jobs and make America as perfect a place
as it can be and it starts with taking care of the Veterans their wars
of choice created.
The repugicans oppose spending even a fraction of the
amount of money to conduct the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan on the
Veterans those wars created. In fact, over the past five years repugicans opposed spending any money on anything for this country or
its people because they claim the country was broke, but they never once
flinched at the cost of the wars. Likely because their corporate donors
in the oil industry and military industrial complex were the
beneficiaries; the troops or returning Veterans certainly did not
benefit from the repugican largesse for war. It is hardly unreasonable
to expect repugicans to support spending the same amount of money on
Veterans, domestic programs, or rebuilding America that that are willing
to continue spending to conduct the war in Afghanistan.
Americans may have thought repugicans would be as
relieved that the Afghanistan war is coming to an end as they are, but
they would have been sadly mistaken. It is beyond belief that President
Obama’s announcement that at the end of 2014 America will enter a rare
period of peacetime was met with such criticism and disgust, especially
when Americans are weary of the country’s longest and completely
unnecessary war. What is seriously puzzling, is that support for the war
in Afghanistan is reportedly at 20% of the population, but when one
considers repugicans, neo-wingnuts, and religio-wingnut warmongers
love a crusade to kill innocent muslims, it is surprising the support
is not greater. However, the rest of America will love the idea of
entering a rare period of peacetime after over thirteen years of war,
and that certainly includes war weary combat troops.
No comments:
Post a Comment