Connecticut's
law allows judges to order guns temporarily seized after police present
evidence that a person is a danger to themselves or others. A court
hearing must be held within 14 days to determine whether to return the
guns or authorize the state to hold them for up to a year.
The
1999 law, the first of its kind in the country, was in response to the
1998 killings of four managers at the Connecticut Lottery headquarters
by a disgruntled employee with a history of psychiatric problems.
Indiana
is the only other state that has such a law, passed in 2005 after an
Indianapolis police officer was shot to death by a mentally ill man.
California and New Jersey lawmakers are now considering similar
statutes, both proposed in the wake of the killings of six people and
wounding of 13 others near the University of California, Santa Barbara
by a mentally ill man who had posted threatening videos on YouTube.
Michael
Lawlor, Connecticut's undersecretary for criminal justice planning and
policy, believes the state's gun seizure law could have prevented the
killings of 20 first-graders and six educators at Sandy Hook Elementary
School in December 2012, if police had been made aware that gunman Adam
Lanza had mental health problems and access to his mother's legally
owned guns.
"That's the kind
of situation where you see the red flags and the warning signs are
there, you do something about it," Lawlor said. "In many shootings
around the country, after the fact it's clear that the warning signs
were there."
Gun nut agitators oppose gun seizure laws, saying they allow police to take
people's firearms based only on allegations and before the gun owners
can present their side of the story to a judge. They say they're
concerned the laws violate constitutional rights.
"The
government taking things away from people is never a good thing," said
Rich Burgess, president of the gun nut cabal Connecticut Carry. "They
come take your stuff and give you 14 days for a hearing. Would anybody
else be OK if they just came and took your car and gave you 14 days for a
hearing?"
Rachel Baird, a
Connecticut lawyer who has represented many gun nuts, said one of the
biggest problems with the state's law is that police are abusing it. She
said she has had eight clients who had their guns seized by police who
obtained the required warrants after taking possession of the guns.
"It's stretched and abused, and since it's firearms, the courts go along with it," Baird said of the law.
But backers of such laws say they can prevent shootings by getting guns out of the hands of mentally disturbed people.
"You
want to make sure that when people are in crisis ... there is a way to
prevent them to get access to firearms," said Josh Horwitz, executive
director of the nonprofit Education Fund to Stop Gun Violence in
Washington, D.C.
Connecticut
authorities report a large increase in the use of gun seizure warrants
involving people deemed dangerous by police over the past several years.
Officials aren't exactly sure what caused the increase but believe it's
related to numerous highly publicized mass shootings in recent years.
Police
statewide filed an estimated 183 executed gun seizure warrants with
court clerks last year, more than twice the number filed in 2010,
according to Connecticut Judicial Branch data. Last year's total also
was nearly nine times higher than the annual average in the first five
years of the gun seizure law.
Connecticut
police have seized more than 2,000 guns using the warrants, according
to the most recent estimate by state officials, in 2009.
Police
in South Windsor, about 12 miles northeast of Hartford, say the law was
invaluable last year when they seized several guns from the home of a
man accused of spray painting graffiti referencing mass shootings in
Newtown and Colorado on the outside of the town's high school.
"With
all that we see in the news day after day, particular after Newtown, I
think departments are more aware of what authority they have ... and
they're using the tool (gun seizure warrants) more frequently than in
the past," said South Windsor Police Chief Matthew Reed. "We always look
at it from the other side. What if we don't seize the guns?"
No comments:
Post a Comment