Here We Go Again
West Virginia Delegate Brian Kurcaba says rape is awful, but remarks that it can create a beautiful child.…
What is it about repugican politicians that make
them such ardent defenders of conception by rape? Two years after the
U.S. Senate campaigns of Todd Akin (MO) and Richard Mourdock (IN) ran
aground over insensitive comments about rape, the repugican cabal is still casting
itself as the cabal of rape apologists.
Re-branding has failed because repugicans have
embraced anti-choice dogma so thoroughly that many of them won’t even
consider permitting abortions for victims of rape or incest. This rigid
ideological position puts them in the awkward situation of having to
defend the indefensible.
The idea that women who are victims of rape or
incest should have no choice to terminate their pregnancy is ridiculous.
Ridiculous stances lead to ludicrous arguments. So it should come as no
surprise that a repugican has once again stumbled, when
trying to defend compulsory childbirth for rape victims who become
pregnant.
In a debate over West Virginia’s Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act, Delegate Brian Kurcaba (r-Monongalia) stated,
“Obviously rape is awful. What is beautiful is the child that could
come from this.” You see, rape is bad, but just think of the
opportunities it provides. What starts out awful, could lead to
something beautiful. Therefore, Kurcaba reasons, we should not let rape
victims terminate their pregnancies after 20 weeks. Never mind the
woman’s trauma, think of the cute baby that could result.
Clearly the Todd Akin wing of the repugican cabal
never went away. The 2016 pretender primaries will give each repugican candidate a chance to clarify his or her position on
abortion. It will also pose some risk for one or more of the candidates
to stumble on the issue of rape, as it relates to reproductive choice.
Republican candidates have a habit of trying to
burnish their conservative credentials, by being more anti-abortion than
the candidate standing next to them on a debate stage. Proving how anti-choice one is, by wading into the murky waters of being an apologist
for rape, may be a good strategy for winning a repugican primary.
However, it’s a position that demeans women, and in a general election,
it is also a recipe for political suicide.
No comments:
Post a Comment